Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DvUPA-0007fF-Ft; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:19:36 -0400 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DvUP9-0007fA-0B for avt@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:19:35 -0400 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA29746 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:19:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx02.net.com ([134.56.3.132]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DvUt6-0005bJ-SX for avt@ietf.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:50:34 -0400 Received: from mx01-int.net.com (mx01-int.net.com [134.56.112.13]) by mx02.net.com (Switch-3.1.3/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id j6L6NGTL019134 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:23:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmt-ex01.net.com (fmt-ex01.net.com [134.56.112.251]) by mx01-int.net.com (Switch-3.1.3/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id j6L6FUOO013270 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:15:30 -0700 (PDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:18:50 -0700 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: SRTP: question about MKI length Thread-Index: AcWNvA+yiuUd4s1JTfyf1sLFpPAmSA== From: "Usha Sharma" To: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=8.0 tests=AWL,HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on fmt-spam02.net.com X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Scan-Signature: d185fa790257f526fedfd5d01ed9c976 Subject: [AVT] SRTP: question about MKI length X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0980944936==" Sender: avt-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: avt-bounces@ietf.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0980944936== Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C58DBC.0FE0C5D1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C58DBC.0FE0C5D1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There is no description in RFC 3711 for upper limit of MKI length and range of MKI value. SDP (draft-ietf-mmusic-sdescriptions-11.txt) defines that MKI value is a positive integer and MKI length could be up to 128 byte. Is it worthwhile to use such big MKI value for voice applications, considering the bandwidth overhead introduced by it. What would be the optimal value of MKI length for most applications?=20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C58DBC.0FE0C5D1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

There is no description in RFC 3711 for upper limit = of MKI length and range of MKI value. SDP = (draft-ietf-mmusic-sdescriptions-11.txt) defines that MKI value is a positive integer and MKI length could be up to 128 = byte. Is it worthwhile to use such big MKI value for voice applications, = considering the bandwidth overhead introduced by it. What would be the optimal value of = MKI length for most applications?

------_=_NextPart_001_01C58DBC.0FE0C5D1-- --===============0980944936== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Audio/Video Transport Working Group avt@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt --===============0980944936==--