Return-Path: X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9963A120809; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 21:35:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.921 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.026, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KOaj-10Zii1i; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 21:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io1-f54.google.com (mail-io1-f54.google.com [209.85.166.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD9BB120802; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 21:35:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-f54.google.com with SMTP id d25so51448519iob.6; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 21:35:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5d/UbLOoXW66mK77PLO5BrpV+d4x7wgbiFqXu64GZcs=; b=TSrCA/ZLSPA4H4wtv1vfD9oALUVuVFFhLjUEWKUClOZ/dqrraJqGXMCIXl8SFt2C1x bHgSOhQN8tExoHnQ7eCh1Vvop6aCsn9hMFpDurUeFGX3LeJRc6beE3FDJxOcmYUtaJow LTZNxLrqGeWCo6M0vJ1HC02qDedk44IQ5xISHRBTd5XaNydYImDlOdN79YS+tYd5d+N5 fffgX1Vn+XuDzHm0kgTuyDdDB/c5twpHVVoFfO8TQrbbj84je/GYoymagkB1NaLvmhlI ntjcHZjFbXI9br4BeaY54zjFm2xYzT+8GgGZnsIOm7rcdFU0v1Wp7IKFIVt4BIcorkFi 9Xfw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXGsmW2EMqCBPr+Vptq7/c5wxwPKdImqi+ZxU0sGuIvnRSmEPXS hqym84z/cTz1ydgN7S2WSKrvhtsuIQ5GAVsQrZRfdQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxba50iEg+4w9tG259/JNduzyubsIa4Ti5OAJImTwTbhOKX7eIybb0ztCHQco7Jr3h+dw1zmxDFDb7PR8b+M7Q= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9714:: with SMTP id h20mr2166044iol.294.1568262910403; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 21:35:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Barry Leiba Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:34:59 -0400 Message-ID: To: "draft-ietf-avtcore-multiplex-guidelines.all@ietf.org" Cc: "avt@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b0694e059253a9e9" Archived-At: Subject: [AVTCORE] Moving draft-ietf-avtcore-multiplex-guidelines along X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 04:35:17 -0000 --000000000000b0694e059253a9e9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I=E2=80=99m so sorry to have let this document get lost, but I am on it now= and will move it along without further undue delay. I=E2=80=99ve had a look at version -09 and like the changes there. I think= they address most of the comments from Ben and during last call. But... I have not seen any response to Bernard=E2=80=99s TSVART review: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/80u2zgVtdCBDvoRhPmSXRAjufTA ...and version -09 does not appear to address it. Did it slip by? Can the editors reply to that review now? Barry --000000000000b0694e059253a9e9 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I=E2=80=99m so sorry to have let this document get lost, = but I am on it now and will move it along without further undue delay.

I=E2=80=99ve had a look at v= ersion -09 and like the changes there.=C2=A0 I think they address most of t= he comments from Ben and during last call.=C2=A0 But...

I have not seen any response to Bernard=E2= =80=99s TSVART review:
...and version -09 does not appear to address it.=C2=A0 Did = it slip by?=C2=A0 Can the editors reply to that review now?

Barry

--000000000000b0694e059253a9e9--