Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC
Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Sun, 18 July 2021 00:18 UTC
Return-Path: <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77433A2898; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 17:18:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d_hfcuiuZlQn; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 17:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com (mail-ed1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C705C3A2894; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 17:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id k27so18064319edk.9; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 17:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LlwajXx/cDf0UGZ6O53ad89TH1TypwcGSdYwQZCVxE4=; b=srcDuNM0mGzi9Qe8VDolZfLd0NvHmHTqyt+/PRmPMM/tEd+Uw8Fb4FrUjqjVmH72Jy GR8qjGvySgMG1NckaF5yKAzVLr0MlGE8uRJYExPdr8exjzsN5vKex0gXUwUhx4S5ZK7L JJzbjhbuH1iKqDakB8w+2Raks8k6IFy+8A3brnFuSGiSFkb2rwiRIY/1AiuQcZv7jNXe 3qQUg5gToFul1vgVAPRqbV7l+NjNArFqT93tMF/K625RE0500uO4kQwoDRcHiSWFzVnK 5YPFBPuEkspAqPxOiQaa2RkquE2EHrcCO1gGjT8Ztmm4LDzyqmOQJ0IJq9rnwwMLcdya TPWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LlwajXx/cDf0UGZ6O53ad89TH1TypwcGSdYwQZCVxE4=; b=HQvaC3roATENx0Oel/syB1Ry6WmFqKza9LTlAUETSEG6uAN9zKTTyXqFmI6zCRhxl/ 2MEy5hds9+Q5XOqxv+WSCvBWTa1olZMtOsEzAhYQR6YxFvdVerctTxPJTVe8RETSV9Ik ly+wZhkWe4/ryqhpT4t2XEW6KDz4v1D8wdhdbUqcLSHfL5ToiLbzcleXbOs4/VzPoIiJ rGjgLEoo7qjfmROg43KiUKAjQkzqPUJuNA+zm/WheJEvSpbs1eBdFWmrr2qcpB4qESJS Y7oqSZBt3guAr1iaHb/ni3sAJ/6Hvx3cUcNOa+oV7JzEEveZeFxC6PS+MAZXwBFel7BM AAIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530EIyIr6H2N3H+B3vdt19lat5AqEQK11FQUmrNxMwGaxLF8x5g5 nMYD+3hqWDHOZTc96w/mC9k11nZTD+y3pgsWy+Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw5WDCuvcruCmQ/VEtynARrG2e2RpcdzgIEF5qrZULpkgEk0U+QztTrlUt6V2R0W65Kw2OTy+LlIDA4QAQ6wsw=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:da49:: with SMTP id w9mr24897360eds.47.1626567487910; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 17:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <674A60FB-8F32-472A-AB35-DBABE8EED38F@fb.com> <CA+ag07ZaaPmij_LZPPAkM_DDF0vbwTXTV0X-tzwPaBc-M50+TA@mail.gmail.com> <DD4D4FF0-D969-499B-BB2F-FACF48CDEE7B@fb.com> <CAHVo=Zk=jb8DGCYUhvW6C7ZjbGoaCLM7vavtrjfYg2jxB7Oz9w@mail.gmail.com> <BB6D02DF-88D0-4CF0-9E3E-57B9FB77F586@fb.com> <CAOLzse344PWsATjRaya6CbNHV8UAOa_2VYHKjg3ORs5i4aQVfg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAZdMaffLiCKd3xvaeOPkgFqGdkSwZR-_H-2f5TNOn8_-WRKoA@mail.gmail.com> <CAK=xEZO_5b+JqTADtFB1BpM9GkRJTEOhS6fuDnC8t1r_eMNfnA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-f=W+fNzZXGhmvZWm9td_JWyUUS1fN-FsVNLtAyK5psKA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-f=W+fNzZXGhmvZWm9td_JWyUUS1fN-FsVNLtAyK5psKA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 01:17:57 +0100
Message-ID: <CALGR9oYG5kc5dAZNcCrVVn8g=uiQiSvC5wuO9AayCAbJ0qfjvA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike English <ietf@englishm.net>, Victor Vasiliev <vasilvv=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Roberto Peon <fenix=40fb.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, wish@ietf.org, avt@ietf.org, juberti@alphaexplorationco.com, Alan Frindell <afrind=40fb.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Kirill Pugin <ikir@fb.com>, Luke Curley <kixelated@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000051f55a05c75ac1b7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/v_EBt7AFamT9gPHYhN73Z0LtgvM>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:24:13 -0700
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 00:18:17 -0000
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021, 19:36 Spencer Dawkins at IETF, < spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > This is, of course, why ADs get paid the big bucks (ha!), but > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 12:10 PM Mike English <ietf@englishm.net> wrote: > >> I would personally be very interested in a "video over QUIC" working >> group or mailing list. >> > > Martin Thompson said (in a reply that, I think, only went to the QUIC > mailing list(*)) that he thought this was big enough to BOF (which doesn't > mean it shouldn't be discussed at DISPATCH at IETF 111), but does say > something about what a mailing list could be used for. Offhand, I can > imagine: > > - discussion of the existing > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-kpugin-rush-00.html draft > - discussion of potential scope for a BOF proposal > - discussion of proposed text for a BOF request > > Could I ask what the people who are expressing interest in a mailing list > are thinking about? > +1. Good questions. There seems to be some appetite for _something_ that doesn't fit in existing boxes. Defining exactly what might be would be a sensible step on the path to a BoF. Cheers, Lucas > > Best, > > Spencer > > (*) email is archived at > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/ocCm8E-GzP_pn4LBcJyKQeN7GRU/. > > The directness of this draft is perhaps what's most interesting to me. >> In particular, the absence of out-of-band signaling / session >> establishment stands in striking contrast with another UDP-based media >> ingest option: WebRTC. >> >> The signaling needed for session establishment (and the diversity of >> implementations for such signaling) has historically been a barrier for >> WebRTC adoption as an ingest protocol outside of the browser context. >> WISH-WG is working to improve that situation for WebRTC of course, but a >> new QUIC-based ingest protocol presents an opportunity to sidestep some of >> those known-issues by making an architectural decision up front about >> whether that style of session management is necessary in a video >> contribution workflow. >> >> I'm hoping others with more experience on these lists can speak to the >> history and tradeoffs associated with those approaches, but I just wanted >> to call attention to the aspect of the draft that seemed most notable to me >> as an operator of a low latency streaming platform where WebRTC egress and >> ingest capabilities are provided, but where RTMP is still the de facto >> ingest protocol of choice for many users. >> >> Thanks for sharing this work! >> -Mike >> >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 12:32 PM Victor Vasiliev <vasilvv= >> 40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi Alan, >>> >>> Excited to see this draft! >>> >>> Since this isn't technically in scope for either avtcore, wish or quic >>> working groups, what would people think about making a new mailing list for >>> video over QUIC? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Victor. >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 3:27 AM Justin Uberti < >>> juberti@alphaexplorationco.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 1:35 PM Roberto Peon <fenix= >>>> 40fb.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Seems like a good idea to me, unless there is a home that is already >>>>> well suited! >>>>> >>>>> -=R >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From: *QUIC <quic-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Luke Curley < >>>>> kixelated@gmail.com> >>>>> *Date: *Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 1:16 PM >>>>> *To: *Alan Frindell <afrind=40fb.com@dmarc.ietf.org> >>>>> *Cc: *"quic@ietf.org" <quic@ietf.org>, Sergio Garcia Murillo < >>>>> sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>, "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>, " >>>>> wish@ietf.org" <wish@ietf.org>, Kirill Pugin <ikir@fb.com> >>>>> *Subject: *Re: [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hey Alan, thanks for publishing your protocol! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Twitch has also been working on a video over QUIC protocol, albeit >>>>> primarily for video distribution instead of contribution. We're very >>>>> interested in collaborating on RUSH and producing a new standard for live >>>>> streaming! Would there be broader interest in forming a video over QUIC >>>>> working group? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 12:04 PM Alan Frindell <afrind= >>>>> 40fb.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Sergio, thanks for your interest in the draft. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I’m interested in seeing a video ingest protocol standard that >>>>> leverages QUIC as a transport, has some partial reliability support, and is >>>>> less connection-oriented so that servers can go down for maintenance >>>>> without impacting ingest reliability or having arbitrarily long drain >>>>> times. We published our RUSH draft to help kickstart the conversation but >>>>> we’re open to feedback and modifications if they help advance those goals. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Alan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From: *Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> >>>>> *Date: *Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 9:02 AM >>>>> *To: *Alan Frindell <afrind@fb.com> >>>>> *Cc: *"quic@ietf.org" <quic@ietf.org>, "wish@ietf.org" <wish@ietf.org>, >>>>> "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>, Kirill Pugin <ikir@fb.com> >>>>> *Subject: *Re: [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Alan, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I think that the correct place for discussing it is AVTCORE as Bernard >>>>> has indicated, as WISH is not chartered to implement any new media >>>>> protocol. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The draft is very interesting and I would be willing to collaborate, >>>>> what is your main interest? Do you want to try to publish it as it is or >>>>> would you be accepting feedback and include modifications? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best regards >>>>> >>>>> Sergio >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> El mar, 13 jul 2021 a las 17:37, Alan Frindell (<afrind= >>>>> 40fb.com@dmarc.ietf.org>) escribió: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, for several years, Facebook has been using its own video ingest >>>>> protocol over QUIC from our apps to our infra. While we’ve spoken about it >>>>> before, we just now published a draft documenting how it works: >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-kpugin-rush-00.html. >>>>> >>>>> The protocol leverages the advantages of QUIC transport, and features >>>>> a partially reliable mode using only QUIC v1 RST_STREAM. >>>>> >>>>> We welcome your feedback >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> -Alan Frindell >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Wish mailing list >>>>> Wish@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Wish mailing list >>>>> Wish@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance >>>>> avt@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt >>>>> >>>> -- >>> Wish mailing list >>> Wish@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish >>> >>
- [AVTCORE] Video ingest over QUIC Alan Frindell
- Re: [AVTCORE] Video ingest over QUIC Bernard Aboba
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Alan Frindell
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Luke Curley
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Roberto Peon
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Justin Uberti
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Victor Vasiliev
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Lucas Pardue
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Mike English
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Lucas Pardue
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Roberto Peon
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Maxim Sharabayko
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Nils Ohlmeier
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Kirill Pugin
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Lucas Pardue
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Martin Duke
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Alan Frindell
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Alan Frindell
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Das, Dibakar
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Das, Dibakar
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Kirill Pugin
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC Kirill Pugin