IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [AVTCORE] Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-02

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Tue, 26 January 2016 21:41 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486B41B31C1 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 13:41:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EitqSYrFXzzM for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 13:41:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33B0C1B31BB for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 13:41:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.97]) by resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id Alfn1s00826dK1R01lhkvR; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 21:41:44 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([73.218.51.154]) by resomta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id Alhj1s00V3KdFy101lhjyN; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 21:41:44 +0000
To: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>, avt@ietf.org
References: <55894FE8.6080406@ericsson.com> <55FB1E25.7020702@acm.org> <55FC3935.6050605@alum.mit.edu> <560522EF.5000608@acm.org> <56055974.5060702@alum.mit.edu> <56A7D67A.10408@acm.org>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <56A7E817.9020708@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:41:43 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56A7D67A.10408@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1453844504; bh=+QqVtQQtz65C0/JuNM+yZIOiDQaFYs7xzohTx55z9cg=; h=Received:Received:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=t/OM+eLzB7t9JquSQQDyvduKywRGOavvyZ2LCSuESqsE3xH8WzmugYG+Mp1ON1JvH qDaadshl51lv4RL5yjVgd7MZqvRaLnjzdLAXarLfRWiO0v7E+pT4E3EwRn8gB7ZhYQ CKgAWEju8extq8+EiBB6Aa2fZlcZyb/wX0JKItdnJzzEAq81/6rcowSK8uN8XiIODJ z9ftgJ1XLB5PQDfxbxRQFYJWytzXKGfkXjcuMLrhI/BgJmMEuWvCA9mazIkt85P4L6 QorwD2B4m3heN3uo3KWUedv8JeHiyReGIxzbNCJ+Bk04tEIWpmSHfHp/sYidha+dbs ntbZn905E/z3Q==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/wYF0vqTE40kLCiMmpAhD7m7hX3I>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-02
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 21:41:46 -0000

On 1/26/16 3:26 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:

> After more discussions between authors, we decided to remove the section about ordering altogether.  We now think that even if the proposal is not as future-proof as possible, it is good enough.

This works better for me. Thanks!

A few comments on -04:

* Section 5 (Terminology):

This is now section 5. That seems wrong. The document will read better 
if you make it section 2.

* Section 6 (RFC5764 Updates):

The new text still has some remnants of the ordering. In particular: 
"Then if ... Then if ... Then if ... Else if ...".

I suggest changing this to "If ... If ... If ... If ...".

Otherwise I'm happy.

	Thanks,
	Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email