Re: [AVTCORE] Mirja Kühlewind's Yes on draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-16: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Tue, 14 June 2016 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EA012DBC7 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.328
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.328 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K-9iZCE3CkYx for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kuehlewind.net (kuehlewind.net [83.169.45.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0A2012D7B5 for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 10223 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2016 16:40:09 +0200
Received: from nb-10510.ethz.ch (HELO ?82.130.103.143?) (82.130.103.143) by kuehlewind.net with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 14 Jun 2016 16:40:09 +0200
To: Varun Singh <varun@callstats.io>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
References: <20160613221046.6815.11590.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6368439E-52E1-479C-BF9C-AE32D0CC8BEF@csperkins.org> <51E76B10-EAB9-4B85-BE3C-ABDE7F2024E6@nostrum.com> <CACHXSv5B_Tzg-JNA_6A+tQYeOh2DjjZh5kY3vYG66ef7sk8DRQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <57601748.2030908@kuehlewind.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:40:08 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACHXSv5B_Tzg-JNA_6A+tQYeOh2DjjZh5kY3vYG66ef7sk8DRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/wjJbD_lV68XiyuLI3sCSgfAg0D4>
Cc: avtcore-chairs@ietf.org, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF AVTCore WG <avt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Mirja Kühlewind's Yes on draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-16: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 14:47:35 -0000

Okay. Was just double-checking.

Thanks!
Mirja

On 14.06.2016 10:59, Varun Singh wrote:
> I agree with the assessment. There is no requirement to read the tsv draft to
> implement the circuit breaker.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:44 AM Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com
> <mailto:ben@nostrum.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     On 14 Jun 2016, at 9:07, Colin Perkins wrote:
>
>      >> On 13 Jun 2016, at 23:10, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net
>     <mailto:ietf@kuehlewind.net>>
>      >> wrote:
>      >>
>      >> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
>      >> draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-16: Yes
>      >>
>      >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>      >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
>      >> this
>      >> introductory paragraph, however.)
>      >>
>      >>
>      >> Please refer to
>      >> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>      >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>      >>
>      >>
>      >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>      >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers/
>      >>
>      >>
>      >>
>      >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>      >> COMMENT:
>      >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>      >>
>      >> Thanks for address my discuss! Thanks for all the work and
>      >> discussion!
>      >>
>      >> Final comment/question: Should reference
>      >> [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker]
>      >> should be normative?
>      >
>      > I think you can implement the RTP circuit breaker without reading the
>      > TSV draft, so it should be informative, but I don’t much care either
>      > way.
>
>     This is my impression as well.
>
>     Thanks!
>
>     Ben.
>