[AVTCORE] RTCP bandwidth and overhead considerations in RoQ
Mathis Engelbart <mathis.engelbart@tum.de> Thu, 25 July 2024 23:30 UTC
Return-Path: <mathis.engelbart@tum.de>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9867AC14CF18 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 16:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tum.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QasOn18zV0CU for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 16:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de (postout2.mail.lrz.de [IPv6:2001:4ca0:0:103::81bb:ff8a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FD68C14F6F3 for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 16:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WVRv16LNLzyXT; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 01:30:05 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: postout.lrz.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=tum.de
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tum.de; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:subject :subject:from:from:content-language:user-agent:mime-version:date :date:message-id:received:received; s=tu-postout21; t= 1721950205; bh=9MLIo9c+DWM8RgoZaYmdPFWcTlWUZlZQyapng/1Jllg=; b=C Bj1heIW09K3+eTs/p2xO71HmaftnF/t6U15ZkNO2MSYJL0IMaeSfkI2mzUVAk5rw g+R8zmnEt2GmQMY0fcFi3jcrvmjG6PYLzqjBlC9ZuOn/EqtQCMG+M2u/W3GGjpbQ PA5hA5i8dDnZ98QR3v4JTYbExN41fKJaxm+HVuP9H0648dH+C/fS0mwDJJcLH5dx lNVbQV1Z00C34OMCAmw2Lko7t6yocYTzDt/KmO/jn7EaiyHtgpkr6hfljogTaHbo 1VENOPK/2HtLNY+ajT0DeoHXpSs2KnwF1tij3+SDbWqY2QcTNtIZyJbY9JEele02 jLzKGY6YI/GlABPXp0Qow==
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lrz.de in lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de
Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de (lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 20024) with LMTP id iXAb5Ka-SvEP; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 01:30:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:67c:370:128:91a1:7d6b:97f1:e53] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:91a1:7d6b:97f1:e53]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4WVRv00bvWzyXV; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 01:30:03 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <e5b51ae8-8a5e-4a5b-8f1d-82e45609dacf@tum.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 16:30:01 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
From: Mathis Engelbart <mathis.engelbart@tum.de>
To: avt@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID-Hash: SBBEJT6JXSJUFRJTSMFTH5SXXSCJ33TZ
X-Message-ID-Hash: SBBEJT6JXSJUFRJTSMFTH5SXXSCJ33TZ
X-MailFrom: mathis.engelbart@tum.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-avt.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [AVTCORE] RTCP bandwidth and overhead considerations in RoQ
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/x8RW0j6m7NiuSXXtSgWgbFhZNsw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:avt-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:avt-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:avt-leave@ietf.org>
Hi all, We opened a PR in the RoQ repository to address the RTCP bandwidth issue that we discussed during the meeting on Monday. We would appreciate any feedback from the working group before merging it. Please send your comments here or on the PR or the related issue. PR: https://github.com/mengelbart/rtp-over-quic-draft/pull/227 New text: https://mengelbart.github.io/rtp-over-quic-draft/feat/rtcp-overhead-considerations/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-over-quic.html#section-9.2 Diff to main: https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?url_1=https://mengelbart.github.io/rtp-over-quic-draft/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-over-quic.txt&url_2=https://mengelbart.github.io/rtp-over-quic-draft/feat/rtcp-overhead-considerations/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-over-quic.txt Best, Mathis
- [AVTCORE] RTCP bandwidth and overhead considerati… Mathis Engelbart