Re: [AVT] Re: Clearmode definition.

--> Rajesh Kumar <rkumar@cisco.com> writes:
> At 04:11 PM 3/23/2004 +0000, Colin Perkins wrote:
> >--> Rajesh Kumar <rkumar999@comcast.net> writes:
> > > At 03:42 PM 3/23/2004 +0000, Colin Perkins wrote:
> > > >What would be the use case for having the MIME type registered? I've
> > > >not heard a reason why the mechanisms being developed in PWE3 are
> > > >insufficient.
> > >
> > > Say you set up an 384 kbps call via SIP for your video. You do not
> > > use the relevant video MIME because what gets put in RTP is nx64 and
> > > the video/audio is one step removed.
> > >
> > > You may not want to proliferate signaling in your network.
> >
> >Again, what is the application scenario? Why the need to signal Nx64
> >kbps clearmode, rather than the appropriate video format?
> 
> Because in this case you would encapsulate a 384 kbps clear channel in
> RTP. The video and other streams would be within this Nx64 container.

Right - you have a pseudo-wire emulation, running multiple streams within
the pseudo-wire. This would seem to be a typical application for the PWE3
mechanisms, rather than something AVT should consider. 

-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt