Re: [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-11.txt

[Colin Perkins <[e-mail]>]

This version of the draft updates the recommendations in Section 6 based on discussion with the Security Area Directors. There are no changes in the rest of the draft.

Colin


On 19 Nov 2012, at 22:51, [e-mail] wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 	Title           : Securing the RTP Protocol Framework: Why RTP Does Not Mandate a Single Media Security Solution
> 	Author(s)       : Colin Perkins
>                          Magnus Westerlund
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-11.txt
> 	Pages           : 10
> 	Date            : 2012-11-19
> 
> Abstract:
>   This memo discusses the problem of securing real-time multimedia
>   sessions, and explains why the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP),
>   and the associated RTP control protocol (RTCP), do not mandate a
>   single media security mechanism.  Guidelines for designers and
>   reviewers of future RTP extensions are provided, to ensure that
>   appropriate security mechanisms are mandated, and that any such
>   mechanisms are specified in a manner that conforms with the RTP
>   architecture.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-11
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-11


-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/