[AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-13.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue, 07 May 2013 12:21 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C585721F86AE; Tue, 7 May 2013 05:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.164
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.164 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.436, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QMwLvAuSLjpw; Tue, 7 May 2013 05:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A9E21F8529; Tue, 7 May 2013 05:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.44.p6
Message-ID: <20130507122043.6866.3256.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 05:20:43 -0700
Cc: avt@ietf.org
Subject: [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-13.txt
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 12:21:19 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Securing the RTP Protocol Framework: Why RTP Does Not Mandate a Single Media Security Solution
Author(s) : Colin Perkins
Magnus Westerlund
Filename : draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-13.txt
Pages : 9
Date : 2013-05-07
Abstract:
This memo discusses the problem of securing real-time multimedia
sessions, and explains why the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP),
and the associated RTP control protocol (RTCP), do not mandate a
single media security mechanism. Guidelines for designers and
reviewers of future RTP extensions are provided, to ensure that
appropriate security mechanisms are mandated, and that any such
mechanisms are specified in a manner that conforms with the RTP
architecture.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory
There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-13
A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-13
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-man… internet-drafts
- Re: [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not… Colin Perkins