Re: [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-01.txt

Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org> Tue, 24 March 2015 22:43 UTC

Return-Path: <petithug@acm.org>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F521AC7E8 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.236
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.236 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7DUXqyfF-kqP for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from implementers.org (implementers.org [IPv6:2604:3400:dc1:41:216:3eff:fe5b:8240]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0571A1BB3 for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:370:136:c617:feff:feb6:86ed] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:136:c617:feff:feb6:86ed]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Marc Petit-Huguenin", Issuer "implementers.org" (verified OK)) by implementers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96AC920205; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:43:01 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5511E873.1010203@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:42:59 -0500
From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, avt@ietf.org, draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes@tools.ietf.org
References: <20150324212925.29176.38583.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5511DBDC.3090907@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <5511DBDC.3090907@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/zOz3SXePiujhVsl01tyCAr3ePy8>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-01.txt
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 22:43:04 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 03/24/2015 04:49 PM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> Marc,
> 
> I really wonder if the SCTP over UDP allocation should be in this draft.
> I definitely don't think the motivation that is present in Section 1.2
> is reason for this document to perform an allocation.
> 
> I think that allocation should happen at the time when there actually
> are consensus on using SCTP over UDP in a setting which requires
> demultiplexing with STUN etc. Currently we appear to be missing quite a
> bit of glue between SCTP over UDP (RFC6951) and using ICE to establish
> that UDP flow for it.


Please note that STUN over SCTP over UDP has nothing to do with ICE, but with using ORIGIN with TURN allocation.

> 
> And based on the discussion in the WG today, I think there is no
> consensus for this part, thus I would like you to remove it until a
> consensus for including this in this document exists.

OK.

- -- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=NwPM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----