[AVTCORE] Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis

"Brandenburg, R. (Ray) van" <ray.vanbrandenburg@tno.nl> Thu, 11 April 2013 07:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ray.vanbrandenburg@tno.nl>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECCE821F8EA5 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:49:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.503
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.503 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 71RwRWD21zh9 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fromintoutb.tno.nl (fromintoutb.tno.nl []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7CE21F8E94 for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,454,1363129200"; d="scan'208,217";a="1167369"
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.tno.nl) ([]) by mailhost1b.tno.nl with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2013 09:49:33 +0200
Received: from EXC-MBX03.tsn.tno.nl ([]) by EXC-CASHUB03.tsn.tno.nl ([]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:49:32 +0200
From: "Brandenburg, R. (Ray) van" <ray.vanbrandenburg@tno.nl>
To: "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis
Thread-Index: Ac42iQ5wIiEH76hBRRKKB654zp+zdg==
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:49:31 +0000
Message-ID: <FCC100FC8D6B034CB88CD8173B2DA1581CA56936@EXC-MBX03.tsn.tno.nl>
Accept-Language: en-US, nl-NL
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FCC100FC8D6B034CB88CD8173B2DA1581CA56936EXCMBX03tsntnon_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [AVTCORE] Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:49:36 -0000

Hi all,

I've reviewed draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis.

I've got two small comments/questions. I've not followed all discussion on this draft, so my comments might have been discussed earlier.

- Section 1 includes a reference to I-D.rescorla-avtcore-random-cname. What is the nature and intended status of this draft? Is it meant to be updated in the future (the latest version expired a couple of months ago)? If not, is it necessary to include it here for reference or can it be removed?
- Section 3 describes the deficiencies with the generation of CNAMEs in RFC3550, it does not describe the deficiencies in RFC6222 (while the problems with RFC6222 are hinted at in both the introduction and abstract). Is this intentional due to the fact that this draft obsoletes RFC6222 and that document can thus be considered informative for the purposes of this draft?

Apart from these minor comments, I consider the draft to be ready for publication.

Best regards,


This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at http://www.tno.nl/emaildisclaimer