Re: [avtext] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-05

Hi Jonathan,
I did not see the text you added yet as a response to my first question
So to better clarify my question . If the FCI has TTID=0 and TLID=2 . does it mean that it is a request to update both?
This was also the reason for the question about both TTID=0 and TLID=0, which layer need update or is it both?
Can you say that you want just to update temporal or spatial?

Roni

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan
> Lennox
> Sent: יום ד 07 יוני 2017 00:30
> To: Roni Even
> Cc: draft-ietf-avtext-lrr.all@ietf.org; General Area Review Team;
> avtext@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-05
> 
> Hi, Roni — thanks for your review.  Responses inline.
> 
> > On Jun 1, 2017, at 2:53 AM, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Reviewer: Roni Even
> > Review result: Ready with Issues
> >
> > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by
> > the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like
> > any other last call comments.
> >
> > For more information, please see the FAQ at
> >
> > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> >
> > Document: draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-??
> > Reviewer: Roni Even
> > Review Date: 2017-05-31
> > IETF LC End Date: 2017-06-08
> > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> >
> > Summary:
> > The document is ready with issues for a standard track RFC Major
> > issues:
> >
> > Minor issues:
> >
> > 1. Can you specify both TTID and TLID in the same FCI.
> 
> Syntactically, they must both occur.
> 
> If you mean can you request an upgrade in both at once, yes; I’ve added text
> to clarify this.
> 
> > 2. What is the meaning of value 0 for TTID and TLID - TID or LID =0 in
> > frame marking draft means base layer if there is scalability.
> >     This relates to the previous question.
> 
> I’m not sure I understand this question.
> 
> I’ve added text that if C=1, at least one of <TTID, TLID> MUST be greater than
> <CTID, CLID>, and both MUST be greater than or equal to their counterpart,
> so the LRR is actually requesting a layer upgrade.  Is that what you were
> asking about?
> 
> > 3.  What would an FCI with both TTID and TLID equal 0 mean.
> 
> It means you want a refresh of the base temporal/spatial layer, only.
> 
> > Nits/editorial comments:
> >
> > 1. Section 3 "an Real-Time Transport Control Protocol" should be "a
> > Real…".
> 
> Colin pointed out that it should say “an RTP Control Protocol” anyway.
> 
> > 2. In section 3 " [RFC5104](Section 3.5.1)" there is a link to section
> > 3.5.1 but it does not work.
> 
> xml2rfc doesn’t have any way to link to sections of other documents, so the
> “(Section 3.5.1)” part is just a comment.
> 
> I think the internet-draft tooling may have thought I was trying to link to a
> non-existent section 3.5.1 of this document, but that’s outside my control.
> 
> > 3. In section 3.2 "(see section Section 2.1)" section appears twice.
> 
> Fixed.
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art