Re: [avtext] Alissa Cooper's Yes on draft-ietf-avtext-avpf-ccm-layered-03: (with COMMENT)

["Ben Campbell" <[e-mail]>]

On 4 Jan 2017, at 18:11, Stephan Wenger wrote:

> Hi Alissa,
> Those changes below can be taken care of by the RFC editor, no?

Hi Stephan,

I think that's probably true for Alissa's first comment, but if we want 
the RFC editor to take care of the second we will need to provide the 
specific change in an RFC editor note.

Thanks!

Ben.

> Thanks,
> Stephan
>
>
>
>
>
> On 1/3/17, 07:21, "Alissa Cooper" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-avtext-avpf-ccm-layered-03: Yes
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut 
>> this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to 
>> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtext-avpf-ccm-layered/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> - Section 5: s/dependent from each other/dependent on each other/
>>
>> - Section 6: The formulation "the authors' current understanding" 
>> seems a
>> bit out of place for a document that is a product of a WG/the IETF;
>> perhaps "based on current information" or some such would be better.
>>
>>