Re: [avtext] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-05

[Roni Even <[e-mail]>]

Hi Jonathan,
Just another clarification for both TTID=0 and TLID=0 , I understand that there is one base layer, but does this case have any special meaning?
Roni

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gen-art [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Roni Even
> Sent: יום ד 07 יוני 2017 08:16
> To: Jonathan Lennox; Roni Even
> Cc: [e-mail]; General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-avtext-
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-05
> 
> Hi Jonathan,
> I did not see the text you added yet as a response to my first question So to
> better clarify my question . If the FCI has TTID=0 and TLID=2 . does it mean
> that it is a request to update both?
> This was also the reason for the question about both TTID=0 and TLID=0,
> which layer need update or is it both?
> Can you say that you want just to update temporal or spatial?
> 
> Roni
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gen-art [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Jonathan
> > Lennox
> > Sent: יום ד 07 יוני 2017 00:30
> > To: Roni Even
> > Cc: [e-mail]; General Area Review Team;
> > [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of
> > draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-05
> >
> > Hi, Roni — thanks for your review.  Responses inline.
> >
> > > On Jun 1, 2017, at 2:53 AM, Roni Even <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Reviewer: Roni Even
> > > Review result: Ready with Issues
> > >
> > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> > > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by
> > > the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like
> > > any other last call comments.
> > >
> > > For more information, please see the FAQ at
> > >
> > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> > >
> > > Document: draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-??
> > > Reviewer: Roni Even
> > > Review Date: 2017-05-31
> > > IETF LC End Date: 2017-06-08
> > > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> > >
> > > Summary:
> > > The document is ready with issues for a standard track RFC Major
> > > issues:
> > >
> > > Minor issues:
> > >
> > > 1. Can you specify both TTID and TLID in the same FCI.
> >
> > Syntactically, they must both occur.
> >
> > If you mean can you request an upgrade in both at once, yes; I’ve
> > added text to clarify this.
> >
> > > 2. What is the meaning of value 0 for TTID and TLID - TID or LID =0
> > > in frame marking draft means base layer if there is scalability.
> > >     This relates to the previous question.
> >
> > I’m not sure I understand this question.
> >
> > I’ve added text that if C=1, at least one of <TTID, TLID> MUST be
> > greater than <CTID, CLID>, and both MUST be greater than or equal to
> > their counterpart, so the LRR is actually requesting a layer upgrade.
> > Is that what you were asking about?
> >
> > > 3.  What would an FCI with both TTID and TLID equal 0 mean.
> >
> > It means you want a refresh of the base temporal/spatial layer, only.
> >
> > > Nits/editorial comments:
> > >
> > > 1. Section 3 "an Real-Time Transport Control Protocol" should be "a
> > > Real…".
> >
> > Colin pointed out that it should say “an RTP Control Protocol” anyway.
> >
> > > 2. In section 3 " [RFC5104](Section 3.5.1)" there is a link to
> > > section
> > > 3.5.1 but it does not work.
> >
> > xml2rfc doesn’t have any way to link to sections of other documents,
> > so the “(Section 3.5.1)” part is just a comment.
> >
> > I think the internet-draft tooling may have thought I was trying to
> > link to a non-existent section 3.5.1 of this document, but that’s outside my
> control.
> >
> > > 3. In section 3.2 "(see section Section 2.1)" section appears twice.
> >
> > Fixed.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gen-art mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art