Re: [babel] [homenet] about Babel security (questions for Juliusz Chroboczek)

"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> Fri, 10 August 2018 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <bs7652@att.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DBC129C6A; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 07:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wLpam83Eeu-Q; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 07:13:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 972B8130E4C; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 07:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049297.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049297.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w7AE6g3c034275; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 10:13:34 -0400
Received: from alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp6.sbc.com [144.160.229.23]) by m0049297.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2ksamttgnj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Aug 2018 10:13:34 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w7AEDWkA007969; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 10:13:32 -0400
Received: from zlp30483.vci.att.com (zlp30483.vci.att.com [135.47.91.189]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w7AEDToW007903; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 10:13:29 -0400
Received: from zlp30483.vci.att.com (zlp30483.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30483.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 031934014668; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 14:13:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from GAALPA1MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com (unknown [130.8.218.154]) by zlp30483.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTPS id E24224014665; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 14:13:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.5]) by GAALPA1MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.8.218.154]) with mapi id 14.03.0408.000; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 10:13:28 -0400
From: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
To: 'Denis Ovsienko' <denis@ovsienko.info>, Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>, homenet <homenet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [babel] [homenet] about Babel security (questions for Juliusz Chroboczek)
Thread-Index: AQHUMI8LOMAFDjjHXUCJjgs+0LXfp6S49rNw
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 14:13:27 +0000
Message-ID: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DE69F50@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <1644a8a0be0.b4caee6f16267.1270300104515944073@ovsienko.info> <87tvpl9aww.wl-jch@irif.fr> <1644c60a033.c75360b277726.6584770912151361357@ovsienko.info> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DE13054@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <165233adc27.ed43a049260204.815758962497666734@ovsienko.info>
In-Reply-To: <165233adc27.ed43a049260204.815758962497666734@ovsienko.info>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.10.242.173]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-08-10_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1808100154
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/0g07yj_0ikmpiXckPtyBFhFFBZE>
Subject: Re: [babel] [homenet] about Babel security (questions for Juliusz Chroboczek)
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 14:13:40 -0000

>  ---- On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 17:46:35 +0100 STARK, BARBARA H
> <bs7652@att.com> wrote ----  > Hi Denis,  > You appear to have perceived
> events and statements different from how others' have perceived these.
>  > I don't find this thread accusing Juliusz of bad behavior to be an
> appropriate way of addressing your perceptions.
>  > As chair of homenet (your email was sent to homenet and babel), I would
> appreciate an opportunity to talk to you directly (by phone / VoIP) to try to
> better address your perceptions. I find trying to do this by email very
> challenging.
>  > If others share Denis' perceptions, please let the chairs know.
>  > Thx,
>  > Barbara
> 
> It has been a month and a week since then and for clarity I find it necessary
> to follow up.
> 
> Barbara, you had sent me an e-mail directly and thoroughly explained why in
> your opinion I was doing a wrong thing. I had studied that with attention.
> 
> I had answered your message, at length, directly on 2 July and explained, as
> clearly as I could, which meaningful details you did not take into account from
> my point of view. Also I had asked my own questions, including if you still find
> my posts to the list(s) inappropriate given that input. I expected a reply, but
> it never came.

Hi Denis,
I apologize for not replying to you earlier. I will respect your wish and reply to you on list, rather than unicast. I would much prefer to unicast you with what I have to say.
The chief reason I did not reply before was I felt I needed advice on handling this situation. I consider Juliusz to be a friend and needed to make sure I wasn't allowing friendship to get in the way of impartial chairing. At IETF in Montreal, I asked several people who are long-time, respected IETF leaders (with no homenet or babel affiliation, and who do not know you or Juliusz) to look at your postings, provide me with their opinions, and recommend a course of action. 

The reaction to your postings was universally negative. All who saw them considered them inappropriate and abusive. The recommendation was universally to remove you from WG email lists, if such postings did not stop.

I apologize again for not replying to you earlier, but this is a very difficult email for me to write. It is clear to me that you are a highly intelligent person who has considerable technical expertise and knowledge. I also believe that you are a good person with honest motivations. But you don't seem to interpret things the same as other people do.

Your personal attacks against Juliusz need to stop. What you are accusing him of is not a violation of IETF or WG procedures or policies. Therefore the accusations are not relevant. Furthermore, they appear to me to make baseless claims.

If the personal attacks do not stop on the homenet list, Stephen and I will be forced to take the recommended action and remove you from the list.
As Stephen is truly impartial here, I will ask him to make any final decisions on this matter.

I recognize that I'm not the right person to try to help you better understand how people are reacting to your emails. If you are willing, however, I would be happy to find someone who would volunteer to mentor you. I think you are a valuable human being with deep technical knowledge and expertise who has the potential to make a great contribution to IETF.
Barbara

> I accept people have their own plans for their own time. However, in order
> to avoid further misunderstanding in the working group(s), please mind that
> from now on I am unlikely to engage in off-list discussions about this matter. I
> have already explained the problem on the list, several times over, and I
> have raised exactly the points I was going to raise. If Barbara or anybody else
> has anything to add, please do it on the list under your name, like I do.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> --
>     Denis Ovsienko
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> babel mailing list
> babel@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_babel&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-
> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=LoGzhC-8sc8SY8Tq4vrfog&m=rEUH5kHzbYNXLwd-
> cyPRyKR6UyRf8P7NpzoHgfucn48&s=AjodDmUXAB1a7IecLNpGVaxx5QElrd_S
> NPNF8MvrhUY&e=