[babel] minor DTLS comment
"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> Fri, 04 January 2019 13:35 UTC
Return-Path: <bs7652@att.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BDE1295D8 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 05:35:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AN3HekXnKJos for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 05:35:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07573128D0C for <babel@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 05:35:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049462.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049462.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id x04DYtsF000775 for <babel@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 08:35:12 -0500
Received: from alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp6.sbc.com [144.160.229.23]) by m0049462.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2pt80rrqru-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <babel@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 08:35:11 -0500
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x04DZBs8030598 for <babel@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 08:35:11 -0500
Received: from zlp30488.vci.att.com (zlp30488.vci.att.com [135.47.91.93]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x04DZ5Lm030426 for <babel@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 08:35:07 -0500
Received: from zlp30488.vci.att.com (zlp30488.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30488.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id EAEB740002C1 for <babel@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 13:35:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from GAALPA1MSGHUBAB.ITServices.sbc.com (unknown [130.8.218.151]) by zlp30488.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTPS id D25F74048C3B for <babel@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 13:35:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.5]) by GAALPA1MSGHUBAB.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.8.218.151]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 08:35:05 -0500
From: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
To: Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: minor DTLS comment
Thread-Index: AdSkL1vol8xv1+2PTJSCJUACYAMkyw==
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 13:35:04 +0000
Message-ID: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DF82DC1@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.70.254.227]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-01-04_05:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=437 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901040120
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/2yKe_DTw2TOmgpislfZaoVXVIic>
Subject: [babel] minor DTLS comment
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 13:35:14 -0000
Since the DTLS draft is still open for comments, I do have a small one about how the UDP ports are characterized. The IANA assigned ports are default values, and need to be portrayed as such. It's allowed (or should be) for deployed instances to use other values. This is pretty much true of all protocols. Certainly the base babel protocol allows other values to be used (which is why the homenet babel profile mandated use of 6696). Maybe instead of All Babel over DTLS nodes MUST act as DTLS servers on the "babel- dtls" port (UDP port TBD), and MUST listen for traffic on the unencrypted "babel" port (UDP port 6696). say All Babel over DTLS nodes MUST act as DTLS servers on the "babel- dtls" port, and MUST listen for traffic on the unencrypted "babel" port. The IANA-assigned values of 6696 for the "babel" port and TBD for the "babel-dtls" port SHOULD be used. Barbara
- [babel] minor DTLS comment STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [babel] minor DTLS comment David Schinazi
- Re: [babel] minor DTLS comment STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [babel] minor DTLS comment Dave Taht
- Re: [babel] minor DTLS comment David Schinazi
- Re: [babel] minor DTLS comment STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [babel] minor DTLS comment Dave Taht
- Re: [babel] minor DTLS comment David Schinazi