[babel] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-hmac-10: (with COMMENT)
Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 15 April 2020 23:42 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: babel@ietf.org
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ECC93A0D6A; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-babel-hmac@ietf.org, babel-chairs@ietf.org, babel@ietf.org, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, d3e3e3@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.127.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <158699416097.13765.6337446751341049891@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:42:42 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/3ouIEiiIBd55JTWh-5IjBUVi5iw>
Subject: [babel] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-hmac-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 23:42:42 -0000
Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-babel-hmac-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-babel-hmac/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Nits: - sec 4.3.1.1 please clarify if the challenge request 300ms limit is per neighbor or per sending node (4.3.1.2 says per neighbor for challenge reply; I suspect it’s the same?) - sec 7. “...this sort of resource attacks less effective...” s/attacks/attack”
- [babel] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Martin Duke via Datatracker