IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-07: (with COMMENT)

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Wed, 21 April 2021 14:29 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363703A2A4A; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2AeVKxD0S4YI; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 802ED3A2A1D; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id 13LETHsu022372; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:29:17 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825ECEF11A; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:29:17 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id zhdJWvziXCtC; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:29:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DFC6EF116; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:29:15 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:29:15 +0200
Message-ID: <877dkvaeys.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-babel-source-specific@ietf.org, babel-chairs@ietf.org, babel@ietf.org, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <160402882613.17493.9555978018041518117@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <160402882613.17493.9555978018041518117@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.1 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:29:17 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 608036BD.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 608036BD.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 608036BD.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/4YBXp1r7icEvrNLJ1eJHcpxkrCY>
Subject: Re: [babel] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:29:36 -0000

Thanks for your comments.

> — Section 5.2 —
> Please expand “AE” on first use.

Done.

>    A node MUST NOT send
>    a wildcard retraction with an attached source prefix, and a node that
>    receives a wildcard retraction with a source prefix MUST ignore it.

> The “it” here is ambiguous: please specify “MUST ignore the source prefix” or
> “MUST ignore the retraction”.  The same comment applies also to the subsequent
> paragraph.

Done.

> — Section 6.1 —
> For what it’s worth, I don’t find the diagram to add anything to the text, and
> I wouldn’t have a clue what the diagram was trying to say without the text.

The whole section has been rewritten and moved to the introduction.

>    Packets
>    destined to D but not sourced in S will be forwarded by A to B, and
>    by B to A, causing a persistent routing loop

> That text is describing not what will happen with this standard, but what
> *would* happen if this standard didn’t correct for it.  So please change “will
> be forwarded” to”would be forwarded”,

Done.  This is now Section 1.3.

Thanks,

-- Juliusz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email