IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-babel-dtls-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 13 August 2019 03:01 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F23612006A; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 20:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uxKdwmC80d65; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 20:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29FC3120052; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 20:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id f9so1626448ljc.13; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 20:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jJ4WuNf1d581g1iBYqympDVFw7hVE+PGxdBv87GoFI4=; b=T2Ql9sDlyohNjIyUuecN0PjG+YJixE5SJzpIqhoC+b33dlw+v9uoAYIoMU11JdqSfb yYZzw3CPPCOEcQuo2NN+NrHbRbmJZ9CwB2RuL47ePwnxWWLBvkb8MIxmdhVlLjpHfuSz XWoIBaXlDVcDXN/UUzDE1f0U5lx8svHIMbGrL2AytZo6Q+7lMoMXl8IJQkh1rgdVNUZS fLiIrLG+awfX5L0B2w493IO2R9xIhpLT64kchH8syNPMIlvhGoa6GfXsHjKDkfD/R6RD KgygUri729r7FudsnT5LDIn9jTPPOYQg/WeGlJh+uXIHXRaL5gaS9Q4M7orgcmEFKJcZ GEsQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jJ4WuNf1d581g1iBYqympDVFw7hVE+PGxdBv87GoFI4=; b=r4Ss4vcIPKv6WF1hpT2/wHvDjO6BAyigap0h1TqZQ0YE1o9hqyTrDUqKHAzY481JA0 79/3G15lkXMhL1/izmJGJwIbVN4cCbZekg3EvLsjEMvcQX2WnXDetNIYNgSo+FnRI1CI bQWVC04+KkZIArXMyrI+9Scm0f1QsMNESOV/j2LikyQ/CZCj8xU972P3ZFtPXYa3tthT /NG4aW4ZZSe4h6/JsxI47/sIddUCy9re0FjaXxYS0b+Il3FjdakFyykAwJL4TfaamlYs 3Nv9fbiEuS6X1qwStih4GSJTvBXuFR1tpx3HHngllbUlggbboDxtJyhJijW7GsGhQZOB uPgw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVUCcxbedL4XH92Bd5m69E4yLzK8j1QFZkzVsNHXNtMYhXkM1di P4fmbJOkWg2SJaK6BjUgNKmb8czuDIqgWhUnpa0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyQ72+AORCU2YilBuNimUjArVSnuAY6HMHWg4kFO3FbtYtKnfr3anNuXsSwSLwVoKuWGv44qEs1ID7x9riRDm4=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:96d5:: with SMTP id d21mr20894907ljj.170.1565665258223; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 20:00:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156520596444.8244.649940515091541992.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAPDSy+5fTinvfPeLMkMOx31SwCL6_Wuzkqif0xGR=BTCPLvBYA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPDSy+5h0-pOTJTiaR7cvr0w1Qc7_mrk20jxaVSW-eG-cirmEg@mail.gmail.com> <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B34054D4@marchand>
In-Reply-To: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B34054D4@marchand>
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 20:00:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+4NCpv0WmWWV=NGOwENrNtaTZcaV=DnS8G+N=TE=YFQRA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-babel-dtls@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-babel-dtls@ietf.org>, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, babel-chairs <babel-chairs@ietf.org>, Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008dbaf4058ff6d96e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/6tdDr12oBRkk9YWH1yRFfrG0_ik>
Subject: Re: [babel] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-babel-dtls-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 03:01:03 -0000

Thanks for your reply!

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:35 PM Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> wrote:

> Ben’s recommendation to explicitly note that this authentication needs to
> be solved in external profiles would address my concern too:
>
>
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/5AnLlaHPTEsBJpV7WVrZLpw07ls
>
>
>
> (I don’t know if you were waiting on Ben for anything else, but …) I
> didn’t see this discussion about profiles in the new -08 text.
>
>
The new profile text was added after -08 was submitted, it's in this commit:
https://github.com/jech/babel-drafts/commit/458a9ae6b9b136122d8668b26ba403f4f3a57167

Does it resolve your concern?
If yes we'll submit a -09 with this new text.

Thanks,
David

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email