IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] Babel filtering: routing policies

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Sun, 25 August 2019 01:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF791200A4 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 18:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e8KfE26QLwEj for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 18:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x429.google.com (mail-pf1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EE1F120046 for <babel@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 18:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x429.google.com with SMTP id c81so9212644pfc.11 for <babel@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 18:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=T/Wbs6T/BPVweMHlAwF077hRyXek5uUZR5/Qqx7Empw=; b=oLvU6dD0sHaa8D57J9QkAsMYgsutslssJ1j8y0EoGoghpY19aUwEbtzhFuKwzczMYl +6kFFVTwIkR493clNz9wR22WnFLxr3Ah8nlDZN75L6pa5DjjUBlSttoqcOnMd2pVUT4d aPEhrqoO+DvgRpSWLqr2xv+c7KU8UmWBsQtRi5RvX0ykrf345duODU7B5/WhzRzQ36Xu UUkvQxnub8Aph6keJFPswsRb4xLuK72KsxXwIAwTu7wyk7uC72BpkV1MFNXBBjaOAsdS vmQgZ1043XpeNeB0Ar58V6QpVnk+61ZrpWDiZp6C/YpttbnRLTOWBA063unziiA6YvWV dshQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=T/Wbs6T/BPVweMHlAwF077hRyXek5uUZR5/Qqx7Empw=; b=pxDTgZz26a/I2j7OPaBsnuKdD7mz483X6hFsS10h8BGv/0sKephgK9feX1APPO/W84 Vq25717JdCLkFd2Fo6Xv3JnoYEM3/I2/tlj/SGY7xIGvXY4tcPSUBYKMLFeuZD/fNtlY Qo+DluWdPqVcL23cJBqREusKTDUTxdHPxfkmz8jngtFHR+lmDAv+XZnGcRudOrWOcsTX KMwpc5aX1aPg0N4gpRgPWggJ0hl3i/B0e6sd2ULBjm7XqaB9ExsqjqHApM7GxRTe4b25 8nHcvZu0fUoQp6Q/ITzy+pLqk4+/GTWS0mXtcGVPDaK5vXYR6TzkmPSb6JOdh8hACAmb gzlw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUZfXfoE3zBNrVivf5tg3lgcIQIZssxJJKMYibaWWGT/PoUQp1T OpnuaOjdscbKgcxbwCf5+lE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzPwxoylOj0ba7LqoSZx/HeV4FfVOLyz6cjZUbvLtb5DuKN5C6vb+SaKGZtm6rlBxrWTbJXvA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:23c8:: with SMTP id g66mr12643214pje.123.1566695957728; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 18:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.122] (c-73-93-49-153.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.93.49.153]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h195sm11707956pfe.20.2019.08.24.18.19.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Aug 2019 18:19:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <62465DB0-7F74-4539-B7B7-314E7ECE034F@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C73FE8B9-149D-440D-ADC3-1B9FE38D247A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 18:19:15 -0700
In-Reply-To: <87lfviga9f.wl-jch@irif.fr>
Cc: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, "babel@ietf.org" <babel@ietf.org>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
References: <87lfwn5d3d.wl-jch@irif.fr> <D659D3AF-B73D-417F-9751-3CD4DE36B4E2@gmail.com> <874l277c22.wl-jch@irif.fr> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E2877EB@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <87lfviga9f.wl-jch@irif.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/7x4DAAjRR5SfMN3oYY7gIVVC_4Y>
Subject: Re: [babel] Babel filtering: routing policies
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 01:19:20 -0000

Hi Juliusz,

> On Aug 24, 2019, at 2:53 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:
> 
> The question, of course, is whether we want to model that in a unusual
> object model encoded over XML, or whether it can remain an implementation
> detail.  I'm not going to bore you with my opinion (since you already know
> my take on unusual object models encoded in XML).

If you rewind back a few meetings (103 to be precise), I did ask this question to the WG. Martin, our AD was the one to respond in the affirmative. 

This is something that is bound to come up when this document goes through IESG LC, so I am being proactive by addressing it now.

Cheers.

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email