Re: [babel] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-babel-hmac

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> Sun, 23 December 2018 14:12 UTC

Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9846A12426A; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 06:12:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=toke.dk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00B8WoNc1M6J; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 06:11:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02DBD126C7E; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 06:11:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1545574316; bh=pla4hIKTnRPBXenCs3Y9zWov7gTCIMH9qWJbQzUtmHQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=G6iDBPAb85vJjncgOmFIFZdbPDittIO88OEGz06NsuCwfr7Y6NAguyx4eNJvV8pd5 vqMraLnTqcXsnU2W45pErLU5yMn4rK5rwsXRf7MbRrGM3RIYIw7qfJ0cysQels+G6Y qpp0L0r9/fQz/glUPzgnkUoSStiZJ6C59yW4IlQfPCW2L5GhdhLPPCesBuULr6xIsq 74vaqEbx2EMuDhjlCx2ajtmjX+jjPXIb7w5ch9K76zNEmqIwYaUI2MXtZl6OeGGmV+ ZDvDiPMf7392xSBllkR/R4pRw5PLjcPWf+zZluK94RqaqgXVTPCP4YB1wum/HK9zAt tj+GEkIAkXtAg==
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Cc: babel-chairs@ietf.org, Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4vF9fX+WF-B2n4GA5SSvSO-kyaq+Y6MV=cbfb-su6LrA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF4+nEFK9myw_RazFN_tsJmdY2m53jWP5jUUBF3Ebm71y5mywA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA93jw4vF9fX+WF-B2n4GA5SSvSO-kyaq+Y6MV=cbfb-su6LrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 15:11:54 +0100
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87pntsfi39.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/8wDw5iq6JJyIJllNq1B5EXdMcTc>
Subject: Re: [babel] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-babel-hmac
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 14:12:02 -0000

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:

>
> "Every implementation MUST implement HMAC-SHA256
>    [RFC6234], and MAY implement other HMAC algorithms.
>
> I think we managed to get blake2s up to a SHOULD in the past weeks. :)
>
> "Every implementation MUST implement HMAC-SHA256
>    [RFC6234], SHOULD implement blake2s, and MAY implement other HMAC algorithms.

+1 on this, BTW :)

> ....
>
> 7.  IANA Considerations
>
> Has anyone gone to iana so these tlvs can be baked in stone?

And yeah, this would be useful to have set before I submit the Bird
patch upstream.

-Toke