IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] [Babel-users] IPv4 over IPv6

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> Wed, 01 April 2020 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DCD3A188D for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=toke.dk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rZzCaDxjFw8F for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2a0c:4d80:42:2001::664]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CD743A188B for <babel@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1585771112; bh=VM3asjFpGk6zu8Fr31SY9lm2d8g7JnNxBovAtnpqZo4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=VRWWOY5F8cRib4OKf4WCogkVlzN4ioBsB5iPLFbIGPuL/PPc5IQ/UwjT/BAhzp+sn aL3zX2VAviTGi3NxSj0rWje4mnsxk6Tc2fLUMtRlRRmKLpFwGrpF9U6S7KZ27RLnEo WRkNkNft9jE6nZHwKgELy601UO2NlaL86KtZC3t5x9Y7iDG1uW/IVrQWn9IeCZPVgP KTmckngEdJwLSJ6hIcQ0djGxtWPJTwmqcPuebb9r2aR+YZ8hz/6s3Dgt4l8Orc4Let yMWHu3aeHnKLoQ9iIjWuj+ho9R5Q/W2u6Gu5v1eEdsEdpXANpOpss9FdFOVB7+8BQ6 ItyYWJ1Yesj6Q==
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>, Théophile Bastian <theophile.bastian@ens.fr>
Cc: babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org, babel@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <87h7y3881r.wl-jch@irif.fr>
References: <87o8scpgkq.wl-jch@irif.fr> <877dz0iayl.fsf@toke.dk> <8c4ed02b-72b0-96a8-0492-9d45016ea5a9@ens.fr> <87h7y3881r.wl-jch@irif.fr>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 21:58:32 +0200
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87y2rff05z.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/A1kANPSVSYbYAIVOcj8T0UWam7I>
Subject: Re: [babel] [Babel-users] IPv4 over IPv6
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 19:58:41 -0000

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> writes:

>> I discussed this again with Juliusz, and we also agreed that (2) is
>> more natural, both conceptually and in the code itself — at least in
>> babeld. I'll rewrite the code shortly with option (2).
>
> Let's all sympathise with this poor intern who has to redo everything
> because his supervisor keeps changing his mind.

Much sympathy indeed. Théo, the trick to avoiding this repeating itself
too many times is to develop a keen sense for when your supervisor is
wrong, and managing him accordingly ;)

-Toke

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email