Re: [babel] rfc6126bis security implementation requirements
Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Fri, 16 November 2018 13:07 UTC
Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D3D12872C for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 05:07:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LHdGYAGmrnw3 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 05:07:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8203312426A for <babel@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 05:07:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id wAGD6sip029736; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 14:06:54 +0100
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C23071B1F; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 14:07:00 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id Qa2XGVTghHRQ; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 14:06:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [138.231.120.148]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31D5871B1A; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 14:06:58 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 14:06:57 +0100
Message-ID: <87va4xw4r2.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Russ White <russ@riw.us>
Cc: 'Babel at IETF' <babel@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <008f01d479b4$34a63910$9df2ab30$@riw.us>
References: <CAF4+nEHaYMX_iLvE5teUvk97ZmO03oS1LRaS1A7BiNaLMEwcWw@mail.gmail.com> <87o9axrvrm.wl-jch@irif.fr> <CAF4+nEH+K3hGfrTQTR+5kH_FCtJok-qoZ_J3e9_zeWCiWjWQ=g@mail.gmail.com> <008f01d479b4$34a63910$9df2ab30$@riw.us>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Fri, 16 Nov 2018 14:06:54 +0100 (CET)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5BEEC0EE.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5BEEC0EE.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5BEEC0EE.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/AiuSKMJLEAZVk4JLr-LNJ1NnMq8>
Subject: Re: [babel] rfc6126bis security implementation requirements
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:07:06 -0000
> If we need to mention something, then I would make it a "MAY," so that > folks know it's out there. It might be worth building an appendix > someplace explaining why this is difficult? I think that David and Antonin have done a good job in the Applicability section of Babel-DTLS. I'd rather not litter 6126bis with this kind of considerations, it's grown too much already since 6126. (Please review the Applicability section of Babel-DTLS, and tell us if that's good enough.) -- Juliusz
- [babel] rfc6126bis security implementation requir… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [babel] rfc6126bis security implementation re… Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
- Re: [babel] rfc6126bis security implementation re… Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [babel] rfc6126bis security implementation re… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [babel] rfc6126bis security implementation re… Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
- Re: [babel] rfc6126bis security implementation re… Russ White
- Re: [babel] rfc6126bis security implementation re… Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [babel] rfc6126bis security implementation re… Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [babel] rfc6126bis security implementation re… Toke Høiland-Jørgensen