IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] Notes on 6126bis

David Schinazi <dschinazi@apple.com> Sat, 22 July 2017 10:49 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi@apple.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F11131DF7 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 03:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mioSTcsW7EJ0 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 03:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-in3.euro.apple.com (mail-in.euro.apple.com [17.72.148.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A22E2131DAA for <babel@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 03:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=apple.com; s=mailout2048s; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@apple.com; t=1500720577; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-id:To:Cc:MIME-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-reply-to:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=hxN9jENBP8WHqwa7f5aHw9HOOQtanSYYC/g7EmWfaXg=; b=0b+30DSO6RdnMoN34gdQFl0/Z2bmIJ/16Vv/P/GKxbEMZLszQVrI76aGQXfSDq/e JVaehRh1F9lrBJFkHZa0QSdeLZNa03zB6Cnzu4Wp0oXGZ86vXad7jhV4wMCfA52e eyU0JVvH1p9QWrhfHuGZsugxs84Tc5O16mSck29d7Gzw0IZBHQk+XZET+Pv7f4vG vMRQ8WkbMtg01+t/AcLixmgJsBieVDa3RGWDdfSMf/4HohA2KMDVtau0SJMJyS3H EpYhA6sgYpz9NkkdsE6/Rurhtr1D/d+tT236ZgwhZYfyuyvKgwrfPnornPacfzu1 O2lS+Ls81HxBjIclMYMYRg==;
Received: from relay1.euro.apple.com ( [17.66.55.11]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail-in3.euro.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id DF.D2.07437.1CD23795; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 11:49:37 +0100 (BST)
X-AuditID: 1148940d-a9bff70000001d0d-39-59732dc1c3e4
Received: from crk-phonehomebzp-sz04.euro.apple.com (crk-phonehomebzp-sz04.euro.apple.com [17.72.133.84]) by relay1.euro.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 0F.3E.10112.1CD23795; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 11:49:37 +0100 (BST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Received: from pc14.home (ABordeaux-651-1-87-179.w90-5.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.5.130.179]) by phonehome4.euro.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.1.2.20170222 64bit (built Feb 22 2017)) with ESMTPSA id <0OTH00C4QNEOGA50@phonehome4.euro.apple.com>; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 11:49:37 +0100 (IST)
Sender: dschinazi@apple.com
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <87shhon5zl.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 12:49:30 +0200
Cc: Matthieu Boutier <boutier@irif.fr>, Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <CFA925EC-B56D-4C5E-8935-4379EE1700D3@apple.com>
References: <048FE0D8-F651-4FB0-8980-421C2F8FFC8D@irif.fr> <FB170423-34B3-4973-BE0A-0661240C11D1@apple.com> <A7F21726-8364-4ED4-B95B-5D9031E4A473@irif.fr> <87shhon5zl.fsf@toke.dk>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrKLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi6GTOrXtQtzjS4OdreYsti7pZLA5/aWSx 2Pp+BbsDs8eSJT+ZPBZvecvoseXQRbYA5igum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujBOrX7IVrGOv6N9/m7mB 8TNrFyMnh4SAiUTXnQ9MXYxcHEICi5gkOt/+ZYNJXLo/jQUi8YxRouXcLxaQBK+AoMSPyfeA bA4OZgF1iSlTciFqtjBJnD3RzgRSIywgLdF14S4rhK0qcergbjaQejYBLYkDa4xAwpxA4fPP LoPtYgGyO1asYAaxmQXcJB4v6YGytSWevLvACrHWRmJN4z42iF3bGSUuLHkMtktEwF6i8esF FoijZSVuzb7EDFIkITCFTWLhloVsExiFZyG5exbC3bOQ7FjAyLyKUTw3MTNHNzPPWC+1tChf L7GgICdVLzk/dxMjKPA9pvDuYLx+0PAQowAHoxIPrwybd6QQa2JZcWXuIUYJDmYlEV59teJI Id6UxMqq1KL8+KLSnNTiQ4zSHCxK4rwmpfKRQgLpiSWp2ampBalFMFkmDk6pBkZJk8z3S4JV jS74Sx4V158r83jW0xzNLdmVDAt07RcvzGRgWuXJ9uZwVglDqYzlZnvjX+ed9v0XE1q/m1lg tr57UtCkf9buWhMUTp5iiNxmfe/5lUeht1tXnnESfN7/TEdh02Ifd66IjjOLHnbcLJ/wN0vX KejGdYbU1NzPFZ57Z592ctI4JqjEUpyRaKjFXFScCADp428+eAIAAA==
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrLLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi6NEaontQtzjSYNddSYsti7pZLA5/aWSx 2Pp+BbsDs8eSJT+ZPBZvecvoseXQRbYA5igum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujBOrX7IVrGOv6N9/m7mB 8TNrFyMnh4SAicSl+9NYuhi5OIQEnjFKtJz7xQKS4BUQlPgx+R6QzcHBLKAuMWVKLkTNFiaJ syfamUBqhAWkJbou3GWFsFUlTh3czQZSzyagJXFgjRFImBMofP7ZZTYQmwXI7lixghnEZhZw k3i8pAfK1pZ48u4CK8RaG4k1jfvYIHZtZ5S4sOQx2C4RAXuJxq8XWCCOlpW4NfsS8wRGgVlI Tp2FcOosJGMXMDKvYhQtSs1JrDTUSy0tytdLLCjISdVLzs/dxAgKVCdz7h2Mx3cbHmIU4GBU 4uHl4y2OFGJNLCuuzD3EKMHBrCTCq68GFOJNSaysSi3Kjy8qzUktPsQozcGiJM47N7swUkgg PbEkNTs1tSC1CCbLxMEp1cCoxaV5pXH7T3axS5cZVZOObrl+WJd9f/VxKQX2dUqSlrtcGDgt 7G6/0c9iy7mv3xadrC5ak7J6q/+F+z/n7ez/+vygW+UzoV2pWm7Cm3f8WHTlsYCB8w2ZVcs6 vl/WDCtWntzRcPPOlOrp8c6TnzyzS2S2mHPjgdbBzy9uPti+3Ezmd6f2933/lViKMxINtZiL ihMBa2tDPFACAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/BEs-VoejoYWFwH9AGfqxkFPC9WE>
Subject: Re: [babel] Notes on 6126bis
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 10:49:41 -0000

I didn't mean "Mandatory Pad1" because that makes no sense to me :)
I was just thinking of making it "Mandatory Reserved" with a length field for future
expansion but in hindsight I don't have an actual use-case, we already can use
new Mandatory sub-TLVs for future expansion.

David


> On Jul 22, 2017, at 12:03, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
> 
> Matthieu Boutier <boutier@irif.fr> writes:
> 
>> Thanks David,
>> 
>>> - just a thought, should we mark 128 as reserved for symmetry with 0?
>> 
>> Do you mean "Mandatory Pad 1" ?  Because for symmetry, the length
>> would be -1 (no length field)...  and IMHO "mandatory Pad 1" sounds
>> really weird !
> 
> I would tend to agree that that would just be weird...
> 
> -Toke
> 
> _______________________________________________
> babel mailing list
> babel@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email