Re: [babel] Minor format problem in draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-04

"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> Mon, 06 January 2020 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <bs7652@att.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4969D120864 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 06:39:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Squs0radhxCY for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 06:39:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00DB7120823 for <babel@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 06:39:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049297.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049297.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 006EZMCp036556; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 09:39:46 -0500
Received: from alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp6.sbc.com [144.160.229.23]) by m0049297.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2xb9475vme-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 06 Jan 2020 09:39:46 -0500
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 006EdiH4029979; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 09:39:44 -0500
Received: from zlp30485.vci.att.com (zlp30485.vci.att.com [135.47.91.178]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 006EddvY029885 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 6 Jan 2020 09:39:39 -0500
Received: from zlp30485.vci.att.com (zlp30485.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30485.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 8E7614009E7C; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 14:39:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from GAALPA1MSGHUBAH.ITServices.sbc.com (unknown [130.8.218.157]) by zlp30485.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTPS id 7791E4009E75; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 14:39:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.43]) by GAALPA1MSGHUBAH.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.8.218.157]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 09:39:38 -0500
From: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
To: "'Mahesh Jethanandani'" <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, "'Donald Eastlake'" <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
CC: "'Babel at IETF'" <babel@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [babel] Minor format problem in draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-04
Thread-Index: AQHVwe4golIkjFFv90qm56f1AaCpn6fY3L6AgAC7pYCAAC8pgIAD8IEA
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 14:39:38 +0000
Message-ID: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61153729C3E@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <CAF4+nEF2enPsrNk+RvDRBJiycpjKe17W50=OJV2XOK7rKdjgfA@mail.gmail.com> <CC940348-5659-4FF3-9ECD-BA67043EB02B@gmail.com> <CAF4+nEGmi3nOBw+CrNdQpg8rQsu3GOdX2KG0tmzOw1Hi3VEgGg@mail.gmail.com> <98799C32-6591-475E-B9F3-B6E31D828154@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <98799C32-6591-475E-B9F3-B6E31D828154@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.10.105.209]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61153729C3EGAALPA1MSGUSRBF_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2020-01-06_04:2020-01-06,2020-01-06 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1011 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-2001060134
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/EwbcLiftxb7TPc3nZrBU101IguI>
Subject: Re: [babel] Minor format problem in draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-04
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 14:39:57 -0000

Hi Mahesh,
In looking over this change, I'm trying to understand how indicating supported metric computation algorithms (expressed through feature + identity statements, but no leaf-list) differs from indicating supported security mechanisms, MAC algorithms, and certificate types (expressed through identity statements + leaf-list).

Why would we not use the same approach for all 4 of these?
Barbara

From: babel <babel-bounces@ietf.org>; On Behalf Of Mahesh Jethanandani
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2020 4:22 PM
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>;
Cc: Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>;
Subject: Re: [babel] Minor format problem in draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-04

Hi Donald,

In trying to make the changes you requested, I came across another change that needs to be pushed.

The information model suggests that babel-information-obj should maintain a list of metric-comp-algorithm that are supported by an implementation. The problem with just keeping a list in YANG is that there is no way to enforce that the implementation uses only those algorithms. To address the issue we had introduced the concept of features in -04 version of the draft.

Using the feature statement, the implementation can declare which of the metric-comp-algorithms it supports, which was the intention of having a list of those algorithms in the first place. As such, we do not need the global list anymore, and needs to be removed. I will be adding that change in the -05 version of the draft.

If you feel that it requires a short LC to be issued, please feel free to do so after I post the draft.

Thanks.


On Jan 3, 2020, at 10:32 AM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com<mailto:d3e3e3@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Mahesh,

You're welcome. My apologies for not noticing it earlier. Can you go ahead and post a revision with this trivial change?

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com<mailto:d3e3e3@gmail.com>


On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 2:21 AM Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Donald,

Yes, that should be ok. And thanks for catching it.

Cheers.
Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>

On Jan 2, 2020, at 8:27 PM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com<mailto:d3e3e3@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Mahesh,

Happy New Year!

There seems to be a minor format problem in this draft, in particular four lines, all identical, that are 76 characters long. Lines over 72 characters are not allowed in Internet Drafts.

On page 34, page 35, page 36, and page 38 the following line occurs:
            xmlns:babel="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-babel">babel:babel
Is it possible to fold this into something like
            xmlns:babel=
                "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-babel">babel:babel
or just reduce the indent of those lines?

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com<mailto:d3e3e3@gmail.com>

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>