Re: [babel] [homenet] about Babel security (questions for Juliusz Chroboczek)

Denis Ovsienko <denis@ovsienko.info> Fri, 10 August 2018 09:46 UTC

Return-Path: <denis@ovsienko.info>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCFC130EF1; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 02:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ovsienko.info
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yS8ZwfT4R0by; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 02:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com (sender-of-o51.zoho.com [135.84.80.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4E57130F2D; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 02:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1533894386; s=zohomail; d=ovsienko.info; i=denis@ovsienko.info; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; l=1737; bh=yg9MEsgMjEK44HqdU+Y05fvHtj/3yoO6GnTEIi82RS8=; b=Ngj/fZ7OeRte/KTKYk0KGEi2JYhXgOtYLBp0ibvd0OsIClsDvUBZTLUiCQVG4MFY TKAWn+mUhxXUdufnFjhWGj9mX9D/9Qzf+BhUAwfLDi2ajTfRLL4Ky8NojYQ3yTijkZf xp+c/bcDBRtmVT2rbtb5Q5NKIntutkz2dvIfZanA=
Received: from mail.zoho.com by mx.zohomail.com with SMTP id 1533894384680140.06050975072287; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 02:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 10:46:24 +0100
From: Denis Ovsienko <denis@ovsienko.info>
To: Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>, homenet <homenet@ietf.org>, "homenet-chairs@ietf.org" <homenet-chairs@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <165233adc27.ed43a049260204.815758962497666734@ovsienko.info>
In-Reply-To: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DE13054@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <1644a8a0be0.b4caee6f16267.1270300104515944073@ovsienko.info> <87tvpl9aww.wl-jch@irif.fr> <1644c60a033.c75360b277726.6584770912151361357@ovsienko.info> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DE13054@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: Medium
User-Agent: Zoho Mail
X-Mailer: Zoho Mail
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/G2pCyfnHasoqlhjkQTMj8T7FQJA>
Subject: Re: [babel] [homenet] about Babel security (questions for Juliusz Chroboczek)
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 09:46:30 -0000

 ---- On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 17:46:35 +0100 STARK, BARBARA H <bs7652@att.com> wrote ---- 
 > Hi Denis, 
 > You appear to have perceived events and statements different from how others' have perceived these. 
 > I don't find this thread accusing Juliusz of bad behavior to be an appropriate way of addressing your perceptions. 
 > As chair of homenet (your email was sent to homenet and babel), I would appreciate an opportunity to talk to you directly (by phone / VoIP) to try to better address your perceptions. I find trying to do this by email very challenging. 
 > If others share Denis' perceptions, please let the chairs know. 
 > Thx, 
 > Barbara 

It has been a month and a week since then and for clarity I find it necessary to follow up.

Barbara, you had sent me an e-mail directly and thoroughly explained why in your opinion I was doing a wrong thing. I had studied that with attention.

I had answered your message, at length, directly on 2 July and explained, as clearly as I could, which meaningful details you did not take into account from my point of view. Also I had asked my own questions, including if you still find my posts to the list(s) inappropriate given that input. I expected a reply, but it never came.

I accept people have their own plans for their own time. However, in order to avoid further misunderstanding in the working group(s), please mind that from now on I am unlikely to engage in off-list discussions about this matter. I have already explained the problem on the list, several times over, and I have raised exactly the points I was going to raise. If Barbara or anybody else has anything to add, please do it on the list under your name, like I do.

Thank you.

-- 
    Denis Ovsienko