[babel] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis-14: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 20 August 2019 20:58 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis@ietf.org, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, babel-chairs@ietf.org, d3e3e3@gmail.com, babel@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
Message-ID: <156633470950.350.2139163872840335541.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:58:29 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/J-zTSTrAx1BQLKcMVQ4x8JmWA1M>
Subject: [babel] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis-14: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for including explanatory text for describing expectations and
limitations of Backward Compatibility in Appendix F, in order to address my
DISCUSS point regarding issues with backward compatibility with RFC6126
implementations.

[babel] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-i… Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker