IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] Shepherd Review of draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-04

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> Wed, 10 April 2019 11:41 UTC

Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9A3120380 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=toke.dk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NMZjls9R6S6C for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 365FF12032D for <babel@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1554896510; bh=RDo3DZ6vhSM/WLYbk+DRKHNQEBpUyzAAwymVb0sXGeA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=h6ZtZkRLTZUDOS3b4ssek/qYLQmgJ49NHhBOZAciPU2drrphF1xUZi9xj8kAkQSSn 7sjXlRfVid29R9SZGkkk2BaQ6qD7KD097Bhuo7Xt5N08SPGPvx2rdTb5bO59vGsTVM M6L88b4KnZmfVI3y6QLPc0aSWAqyLN2HwQXHrKlTxW1hT1alraa8W8d2n4ECLgGcR5 jNG2fLKP5nuNRspXBkPWDob924fGbYVPe1coDB8UdfZPnoEYcX3syEFhdr+TVdYNf3 0iXwgSxLuBzu0q0WNekIKtVQn+Au/mgqTu9TuYvz+gn1gh5Q88EN5ibi7uobQix1+S 68707m/PMUUJg==
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
Cc: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <871s2axfei.wl-jch@irif.fr>
References: <CAF4+nEEfEvg_ktoudURqvCPshrA8SzL+TMGjQm6vUOFX65q==A@mail.gmail.com> <874l76xhto.wl-jch@irif.fr> <874l76w21k.fsf@toke.dk> <871s2axfei.wl-jch@irif.fr>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:41:50 +0200
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87y34iulxd.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/JNX3zJtoNPRq6R4vIv7V1Ut6I7Y>
Subject: Re: [babel] Shepherd Review of draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-04
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:42:03 -0000

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> writes:

>> Dropping the enclosing TLV is no problem, skipping the source TLV would
>> need patches... For reference, Bird currently does the following[0]:
>
> I see.  So your current behaviour can be described by
>
>   MUST drop the enclosing TLV and MAY drop the whole packet
>
> May the MUST be a SHOULD, or must it be a MUST?

If it's a SHOULD, what is one supposed to do instead if deciding not to
drop?

-Toke

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email