[babel] Warren Kumari's DISCUSS on draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6-07

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Wed, 16 February 2022 23:13 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9193A179C; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 15:13:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aZDLwNZCIcpl; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 15:13:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x136.google.com (mail-il1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3518E3A0D5B; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 15:13:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x136.google.com with SMTP id z18so1012253iln.2; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 15:13:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UEu5ExQfczDwiwWO131ivdzc4LQBGFv6gQ/6asfo7U8=; b=JLtcQRynh/pijgi8G/vpZs1O/EtohnPXh8ZTBM6PovswQvK+JXOBR88/KYHO8EZcgl Bl6fFqtvGd2a/owrAiu5E+QdKyWs6mXhCoKqOlC3ejypEYxs4npcOuNDtvEaFfP+mxRf nSz6vs+VKA4xL3kRbpoGYGxvnA2kfBpEXutK1YLge8CdH0TYj7pKBImDIwprorVVihGt r+AmO++Y6J5GNtbz8HvZ6COc71WIwqZn7Gs01HdzXpnlU4J+dXWii+2VWU9VxsiDLnS+ fGJeWUqgw8XIZRiYKXXl8uKyJI6U0T7767WIU2eC1NmwrS0g6l3OK9oLPsVzZBahY7Jo LjGA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UEu5ExQfczDwiwWO131ivdzc4LQBGFv6gQ/6asfo7U8=; b=cW9vHQIAErnLZo5W+eO74/yYQ/SGl0HCAtUwcmyPDsc+kqgnaBm3t9hOTTOW06J5zk Z6SfaU9Cngi28ajD+H75KJtuG+PLnbGhDNZfBEhYjKQuSwTen14GyxkBaK0gsjah7dI4 f/frt79WRCQ826EkJvvjQg3WAeSLsn5tj99myv2saI03Z+yGco6DasZiW+eMaaD0pIy4 hFZlqhXKBxUHdNDcg3DVxgWAiFezADaaLExr0FYUjjl5Xfwsn9K1DfyI470Pf8Ozi+Or tbGaRKScJnLbw3bMHyjXJZZ/elOVUlEyMqfBAPWLW0YL7+zdlTKgUXsbfaUG5XXYMmXs n5pQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ODJswaUc0WhrUpl2N+Wq3wpGAvZwShRAmuSvWlfmXTcA5VHpV FWpVbTr48ibq7OgAUEWtk3FRQ5wa59kkOYlQdgbX60m2
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz97BvjiqziYtJ0l0UFU7WoID71aM0U8zngUS37DRdC71lpWifBvC7DxdZh7olNiaVUpExwnoa8aoMgkJicII4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:144c:b0:2aa:2de5:fb65 with SMTP id p12-20020a056e02144c00b002aa2de5fb65mr74004ilo.103.1645053198057; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 15:13:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 18:13:07 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEF2xoVrvVGsjKEHnhoMEmuvzPTnS8TaY9m71mtYYR38Bg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
Cc: babel-chairs <babel-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/NVZIWH_PWdC03r7He1qXeZvoi-8>
Subject: [babel] Warren Kumari's DISCUSS on draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6-07
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 23:13:21 -0000

Hi,

As you have seen, Warren Kumari is currently blocking this draft,
which the IESG will be considering during their telechat tomorrow. The
best solution at this point would seem to be to change the status of
the draft to Experimental.

Juliusz: I assume you have no objection to this since that was the
status you originally suggested.

Does anyone else object, given the circumstances, to changing the
target status of this draft to Experimental?

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com