[babel] Consensus for draft-ietf-babel-mac-relaxed-02.txt

[Donald Eastlake <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

Probably unsurprisingly, I'm declaring WG consensus to publish this draft.

There is a new policy adopted by the Routing Area directors to require a
Routing Directorate review before formally requesting publication so I will
request such a review. (Probably I should have done that in parallel
with the call for objections below but this draft is sufficiently
straightforward that it didn't seem to be necessary.) Meanwhile, I'll do a
Shepherd review.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   [phone] (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 [e-mail]


On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 9:17 PM Donald Eastlake <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> It seems to me that there is WG consensus for this document. I will so
> declare unless there is some objection in the next ten days.
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
> ===============================
>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   [phone] (cell)
>  2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
>  [e-mail]
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 4:13 PM David Schinazi <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Babel enthusiasts,
> >
> > Many thanks to Juliusz for writing draft-ietf-babel-mac-relaxed-02.
> > I have read the diff from -01 to -02 and it fully addresses the
> > editorial comments I had made on -01 (copied below). I believe this
> > document is ready for publication.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > David
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 3:55 PM David Schinazi <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I have reviewed this document and believe that the protocol itself is
> solid and ready for advancement but the doc needs just a little bit of
> editorial work: I found section 3.2 a little bit hard to follow. I would
> suggest giving variable names to the numbers at play and using those
> instead of "right edge" and "left edge" because it took me a second to
> deduce that the highest seen packet number was equal to the left edge and
> not the right edge of the window. I personally like pseudo-code for this
> purpose but prose also works if we can define the terms a little better.
> Maybe adding some prose to the definition of right edge and left edge would
> be enough to make this fine though.
> >>
> >> I unfortunately no longer have access to a Babel implementation to
> actually implement this, but I imagined I had one when I read the draft and
> it was straightforward to add this feature to my imaginary implementation.
> Now I just need to write an imaginary compiler.
> >>
> >> nits/typos:
> >> s/WiFi/Wi-Fi/
> >> s/porte/port/
> >> s/complementar/complementary/
> >>
> >> David
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 1:30 PM Juliusz Chroboczek <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >       Filename        : draft-ietf-babel-mac-relaxed-01.txt
> >>>
> >>> I feel that this version is complete.  There are two independent
> >>> implementations (babeld and BIRD).  Please review.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> -- Juliusz
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> babel mailing list
> >>> [e-mail]
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > babel mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel
>