Re: [babel] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-06

David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 28 October 2020 23:09 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259273A0A8F; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 16:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2WUbihlmsSsj; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 16:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 913DE3A0A90; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 16:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id d24so1018187ljg.10; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 16:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gkHrB5j9y4WAK2GkxzYCi9Bp1Ziv7BqjU+9s7GWr9AA=; b=l1wsOZnusKEa+PKuWqRvi0s6dyvFOOkKNVWl59a/Rw5974bF2kZ8LI7CkuHVe0FaQH L88UWsw00lB7zEvqwqhHqExM/wOHi+t+0ekIvIcPxa7UR4aUCyCSW6tHifn4uTQH67wl WM7J17xc8iHCcVLx8EzPfd59bzu1qk4mzAYN2BtbqF8vVtAoiTHQsZ79upTyRQjwOl+m cYMmQOH8IRClvrwbHDxnLF4/xGoo7FvbpXxqiI9W9H2GRXJlCH3UhV0CnAOnFsX9/z+N YvwSoiHpTM6x2SIWVoNrnkS21Rn1FzKMu3sZXKi1Q/uG3JsEf5mFWZeVAlooe2xvpNCL 7R6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gkHrB5j9y4WAK2GkxzYCi9Bp1Ziv7BqjU+9s7GWr9AA=; b=fvNzFyQ6sWABO7lZy+d2tE9lY1/XNiW1ns5LXenReFeMD79FBu4uKbMEXLB5aJjFy1 twLvL+G/wrtgQz5iD6ijvZ/nXhmRK7dYYHpfPIAUguhfg5j1QFJpg2i5WdglBjX9rhB1 vIYYfLI6eXdXgM+UgbYzl04YfjyJBcGg29rt69gF5YBho9qb6p9YNH9qe8ELDY4uPPDT lMZaJYF6YEf1ronYiCZuG+3+OPtZkFSP8kk9WJIx7tHvtYpuPzkHxdX5HOmYgd8WceXD FIsr65kjyJr5qPi/AARtKJk4eXoDTcy6eUdvfH3lDGiisLaw86GHJw/p2LXeUp+zRwLf rYpA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531VPwPVmPXuS89GNXMyrERE0BWo5n1gf2cS/21GqV2z3GLuMnqD eIodL8+zipmeo5lLsBtt7e+/u1bTlOJFMUKHdA3wOOGWx3g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyuy9VGK05E7k4Ni73IvF96+8VcHtnOe+shv5X4HPafaBOxNvLOaFERv3sOAvQlw6ZDGzRdutmyWRMPZV+ndsM=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9882:: with SMTP id b2mr542460ljj.247.1603926578814; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 16:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160364731499.17476.11455568556595523172@ietfa.amsl.com> <87o8kmfo2n.wl-jch@irif.fr> <87mu06mlos.fsf@toke.dk>
In-Reply-To: <87mu06mlos.fsf@toke.dk>
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 16:09:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+5yuXJWd48zz9GAz9kjcfDfSPGeo4uJjaO3qoON6yAycw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke=40toke.dk@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>, last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-babel-source-specific.all@ietf.org, Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>, secdir@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f9e32105b2c34130"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/PMvEg-yr4poTCQAiAQLWmXhdoX8>
Subject: Re: [babel] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-06
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 23:09:42 -0000

SGTM2

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 8:10 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke=
40toke.dk@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> writes:
>
> >>   “A node MUST NOT send more that one Source Prefix sub-TLV in a TLV,
> >>    and a node receiving more than one Source Prefix sub-TLV in a single
> >>    TLV SHOULD ignore this TLV.  It MAY ignore the whole packet.”
> >
> >> 2. This paragraph implies that a node might accept the TLV with more
> than one
> >> Source Prefix sub-TLV, but it does not state when a node can do that.
> You might
> >> want to elaborate on the conditions that a node is allowed to do that.
> >
> > Right.  I've made this a MUST, which reflects implementation practice.
> > Group, please feel free to object if you think this is the wrong
> > choice.
>
> SGTM.
>
> -Toke
>
> --
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
>