Re: [babel] RFC 8966 on The Babel Routing Protocol

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> Mon, 11 January 2021 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB983A10AD for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:06:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=toke.dk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MxmjygP2fmiB for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:06:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [45.145.95.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38D313A1010 for <babel@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:06:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1610399178; bh=qMgyxQ8Oa1ApH2zPuFyIsyi1OjyCSG2BxZr6Mu7mdBM=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=OSjYBo8Kdx4Ku7Gc9XLY6TnktGX4XiOthHlFxk5G06kvJwEBTB3nID3gfqeWDAXGw ZAs0LbkaFWTa5+Izid2fFpm9xt2vKGWlyeiBICFhuugypCbTlZ15Nkt9z4mHWvd1WE VXTCCeBudxgyqiLgqcxo424kxmes797VaVujCtWwggVc/RFylscuIr0Fh13eslw//i mq3fyuYrwftjBAwJ6fAGuahsGWcyM1cQutTLcsrt3xqNePI0EhHXLKlQ5kP+XbMWbW VeRlzGWZipP9FNPxG+zwxEbIT1bxV7rihqK2RtubgiUwtbDMDp+8dpYsfctj7Hl8mJ puLBUJSraBDgA==
To: babel@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20210111203843.09F45F40765@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20210111203843.09F45F40765@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 22:06:17 +0100
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87r1mr6v5i.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/PNd7AdzvxdKXeMmjEgZcCzXON7w>
Subject: Re: [babel] RFC 8966 on The Babel Routing Protocol
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 21:06:25 -0000

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org writes:

> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>
>         
>         RFC 8966
>
>         Title:      The Babel Routing Protocol 
>         Author:     J. Chroboczek,
>                     D. Schinazi
>         Status:     Standards Track
>         Stream:     IETF
>         Date:       January 2021
>         Mailbox:    jch@irif.fr, 
>                     dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com
>         Pages:      54
>         Obsoletes:  RFC 6126, RFC 7557
>
>         I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis-20.txt
>
>         URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8966
>
>         DOI:        10.17487/RFC8966
>
> Babel is a loop-avoiding, distance-vector routing protocol that is
> robust and efficient both in ordinary wired networks and in wireless
> mesh networks.  This document describes the Babel routing protocol
> and obsoletes RFC 6126 and RFC 7557.
>
> This document is a product of the Babel routing protocol Working Group of the IETF.
>
> This is now a Proposed Standard.

Yeah! Congratulations everyone! :)

-Toke