Re: [babel] I-D Action: draft-ietf-babel-information-model-08.txt

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Tue, 13 August 2019 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A801201E3 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EJJXwBo-A1nr for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7D8612021D for <babel@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id x7DF18dH020338; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 17:01:08 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330044238E; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 17:01:11 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id 5UbTmyzFQnYx; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 17:01:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FEE44238B; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 17:01:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 17:01:07 +0200
Message-ID: <87blwtun2k.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
Cc: "'babel@ietf.org'" <babel@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E26708E@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <156496962402.26572.16204290795859744323@ietfa.amsl.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E254159@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <874l2uawcv.wl-jch@irif.fr> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E26708E@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 17:01:08 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5D52D0B4.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5D52D0B4.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5D52D0B4.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/RCZngFbU4X2u2TtrqKNLYHn0SpM>
Subject: Re: [babel] I-D Action: draft-ietf-babel-information-model-08.txt
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:01:19 -0000

>> The second point is something we've discussed before.  The
>> implementation has the interface point at the set of keys; in the
>> model, the key set points at the interface.  Is the discrepancy
>> intentional?

> I don't see where a key set points to the interface? I only see where
> the interface points to a set of keys:

Section 3.8:

   babel-hmac-interfaces:  List of references to the babel-interfaces
      entries this babel-hmac entry applies to.