IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] Scheduling a BABEL WG interim meeting

"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> Fri, 17 April 2020 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <bs7652@att.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14593A1024; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8CbV2Vcc7xEE; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B0C63A101C; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049463.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049463.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 03HJAcP3005385; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:19:06 -0400
Received: from alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp6.sbc.com [144.160.229.23]) by m0049463.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 30fg2ebbp2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:19:06 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 03HJJ49u006880; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:19:05 -0400
Received: from zlp30483.vci.att.com (zlp30483.vci.att.com [135.47.91.189]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 03HJJ1LC006852 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:19:01 -0400
Received: from zlp30483.vci.att.com (zlp30483.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30483.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id B237F40145B5; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 19:19:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from GAALPA1MSGHUBAC.ITServices.sbc.com (unknown [130.8.218.152]) by zlp30483.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTPS id 9C7DA40145B4; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 19:19:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from GAALPA1MSGEX1CF.ITServices.sbc.com (135.50.89.113) by GAALPA1MSGHUBAC.ITServices.sbc.com (130.8.218.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:19:00 -0400
Received: from GAALPA1MSGEX1CB.ITServices.sbc.com (135.50.89.109) by GAALPA1MSGEX1CF.ITServices.sbc.com (135.50.89.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:19:00 -0400
Received: from GAALPA1MSGEX1CB.ITServices.sbc.com ([135.50.89.109]) by GAALPA1MSGEX1CB.ITServices.sbc.com ([135.50.89.109]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:19:00 -0400
From: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
To: 'Antonin Décimo' <antonin.decimo@gmail.com>, 'Donald Eastlake' <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
CC: 'babel-chairs' <babel-chairs@ietf.org>, 'Babel at IETF' <babel@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [babel] Scheduling a BABEL WG interim meeting
Thread-Index: AQHWBxc48bnLQy3Nzk2g9L5Hs6MkH6h74ogAgAHmo+A=
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 19:19:00 +0000
Message-ID: <f90dd81a84ac44a7bd962d2f9c8af723@att.com>
References: <CAF4+nEF6CTSEfGSqyKUHCFsJQNVhK+8tUe1QrKjEW+Scm2B6DA@mail.gmail.com> <878sk8gt6e.wl-jch@irif.fr> <CAF4+nEEtmJo8PXOXEitxu3bHdUhPjADu6Aky2joqjg=2jt9Tsw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEGehE1XddDv6sC0BVwsLQs1takAQR3BLHvg1_XmpKGrXg@mail.gmail.com> <CAC=54B+CmqraJwBhL73NNrSrf1AjrVs0+FxPgNGk=M05UzFvEw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC=54B+CmqraJwBhL73NNrSrf1AjrVs0+FxPgNGk=M05UzFvEw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.70.219.8]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-04-17_09:2020-04-17, 2020-04-17 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=712 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1011 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004170144
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/UjG-wibDvvTZeP2VZvCnYkkyP2Y>
Subject: Re: [babel] Scheduling a BABEL WG interim meeting
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 19:19:13 -0000

Hi Antonin et al,
> 
> Hi Donald, hi list,
> 
> I had remarks on the MAC draft and on the information model that I send in
> January.
> I’m completely unaware of the publication schedule for the two documents,
> so I’m hijacking your mail to ensure that they’re not forgotten in the abyss of
> mails.
> 
> [babel] [patch] Info model: fix little inconsistencies in naming, use singular for
> objects.
> <CAC=54BKONDYv44iY6kRPO9pADe=mE+naRDa2n027X8sng+ZKmw@mail.g
> mail.com>
> 
> Re: Babel-MAC: key size and digest size
> <CAC=54BLsU5e4iY8T=NX0_5gt3A7=nZb0qnyGeVA5YnGu7knVHQ@mail.gma
> il.com>

There are a number of potential little changes to the info model draft that I think the group might want to consider, including the ones discussed in January and February. But also resulting from the inclusion of recommended default configuration parameters in rfc6126bis-17. I need to put a list together. Maybe I should present on this during an interim? And our illustrious chairs could tell us if we need a new WGLC or what.

One reason I've been holding off creating a complete compilation, is I was waiting to see if there would be any other changes made to -17 (to resolve Alvaro's comments?). It would be really good if we had some strategy in place for moving rfc6126bis along. It's non-publication makes me very sad.
Barbara

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email