From nobody Wed Apr 21 07:31:11 2021
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2093E3A29F7;
 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249,
 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249,
 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id P1lZjstOyqN5; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-f180.google.com (mail-lj1-f180.google.com
 [209.85.208.180])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38BE33A29F3;
 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-f180.google.com with SMTP id z23so1478419lji.4;
 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=VO9NMTG67RijNXJ03mX3FEemmohomm5X2hn3T0jQnhU=;
 b=DRM3jaA/cS458vdLhtz7+4nsER3ZSugUzswJWr8yH2J2QePsJHgj0bqq3PYIgANDZe
 +bm5H8dhsiriWojgPsu/L6qvkIbFZWWs6K072+JmvTG159PQUFraW/rXhEtcphI/DYb0
 98zBzk0OapHrxCnpVu9Qm1aLvnxmoSZaFbU+3T7ZPGwH/Knzdtq7xe1zUuSvd62Rn/th
 3jKVT+ajRhohcTq6y7gCSmUX513VQ8fkzZo2H76iyknWRdd9Dt2yutnmV+Ee1WoAW/6F
 MC6+nf3t8hzCPy43NArHI6MeqXK6tPjmBnn1WzL3ttm0inPB+1vbkiGCL26fPBGsFluS
 vLkw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530zLMw8v49F1F4FF9M1IgZc0RgV92uPaPNgmMGAjCPybSEmKoCr
 JKppaDkG+nPyWEZfkCrFC/NMUz3IEm41H8AMFRM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxuIZwefwKyPSMBLRmHXxq1EoAgEFVdZl2Lxnrnd+X5jJosUAIIgL5zdXfa8d6XPzgYLkF6gMv3hc+9nm/sFa4=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9b16:: with SMTP id u22mr18703462lji.313.1619015459129; 
 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160402882613.17493.9555978018041518117@ietfa.amsl.com>
 <877dkvaeys.wl-jch@irif.fr>
In-Reply-To: <877dkvaeys.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:30:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+urYiFSdkAW5LhJsYpWZugXQpXfVM3Cs-N3Rqbq3YasA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
Cc: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>,
 babel@ietf.org, 
 babel-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-babel-source-specific@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000053cbb805c07c6958"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/V34Hdb-uByoO82LfM4abSEUNeDE>
Subject: Re: [babel] Barry Leiba's No Objection on
 draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol."
 <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>,
 <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>,
 <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:31:10 -0000

--00000000000053cbb805c07c6958
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks, Juliusz... I appreciate the response, and thanks for addressing my
comments.

Barry

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:29 AM Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:

> Thanks for your comments.
>
> > =E2=80=94 Section 5.2 =E2=80=94
> > Please expand =E2=80=9CAE=E2=80=9D on first use.
>
> Done.
>
> >    A node MUST NOT send
> >    a wildcard retraction with an attached source prefix, and a node tha=
t
> >    receives a wildcard retraction with a source prefix MUST ignore it.
>
> > The =E2=80=9Cit=E2=80=9D here is ambiguous: please specify =E2=80=9CMUS=
T ignore the source
> prefix=E2=80=9D or
> > =E2=80=9CMUST ignore the retraction=E2=80=9D.  The same comment applies=
 also to the
> subsequent
> > paragraph.
>
> Done.
>
> > =E2=80=94 Section 6.1 =E2=80=94
> > For what it=E2=80=99s worth, I don=E2=80=99t find the diagram to add an=
ything to the
> text, and
> > I wouldn=E2=80=99t have a clue what the diagram was trying to say witho=
ut the
> text.
>
> The whole section has been rewritten and moved to the introduction.
>
> >    Packets
> >    destined to D but not sourced in S will be forwarded by A to B, and
> >    by B to A, causing a persistent routing loop
>
> > That text is describing not what will happen with this standard, but wh=
at
> > *would* happen if this standard didn=E2=80=99t correct for it.  So plea=
se change
> =E2=80=9Cwill
> > be forwarded=E2=80=9D to=E2=80=9Dwould be forwarded=E2=80=9D,
>
> Done.  This is now Section 1.3.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Juliusz
>

--00000000000053cbb805c07c6958
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto">Thanks, Juliusz... I appreciate the response, and thanks =
for addressing my comments.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"au=
to">Barry</div><div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=
=3D"gmail_attr">On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:29 AM Juliusz Chroboczek &lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:jch@irif.fr">jch@irif.fr</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote=
 class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc soli=
d;padding-left:1ex">Thanks for your comments.<br>
<br>
&gt; =E2=80=94 Section 5.2 =E2=80=94<br>
&gt; Please expand =E2=80=9CAE=E2=80=9D on first use.<br>
<br>
Done.<br>
<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 A node MUST NOT send<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 a wildcard retraction with an attached source prefix, and=
 a node that<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 receives a wildcard retraction with a source prefix MUST =
ignore it.<br>
<br>
&gt; The =E2=80=9Cit=E2=80=9D here is ambiguous: please specify =E2=80=9CMU=
ST ignore the source prefix=E2=80=9D or<br>
&gt; =E2=80=9CMUST ignore the retraction=E2=80=9D.=C2=A0 The same comment a=
pplies also to the subsequent<br>
&gt; paragraph.<br>
<br>
Done.<br>
<br>
&gt; =E2=80=94 Section 6.1 =E2=80=94<br>
&gt; For what it=E2=80=99s worth, I don=E2=80=99t find the diagram to add a=
nything to the text, and<br>
&gt; I wouldn=E2=80=99t have a clue what the diagram was trying to say with=
out the text.<br>
<br>
The whole section has been rewritten and moved to the introduction.<br>
<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Packets<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 destined to D but not sourced in S will be forwarded by A=
 to B, and<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 by B to A, causing a persistent routing loop<br>
<br>
&gt; That text is describing not what will happen with this standard, but w=
hat<br>
&gt; *would* happen if this standard didn=E2=80=99t correct for it.=C2=A0 S=
o please change =E2=80=9Cwill<br>
&gt; be forwarded=E2=80=9D to=E2=80=9Dwould be forwarded=E2=80=9D,<br>
<br>
Done.=C2=A0 This is now Section 1.3.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
-- Juliusz<br>
</blockquote></div></div>

--00000000000053cbb805c07c6958--

