Re: [babel] Last Call: <draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09.txt> (YANG Data Model for Babel) to Proposed Standard

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Fri, 14 May 2021 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632AA3A3904; Fri, 14 May 2021 09:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QUbnXj7d9dO2; Fri, 14 May 2021 09:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6315B3A3902; Fri, 14 May 2021 09:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id k15so11753340pgb.10; Fri, 14 May 2021 09:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=3AU+//ukumQNIURdkuFGEGXbWbC6PNl6N342++9Bink=; b=cX7rfWGHV/YQYnUE+CFseE7uCfhlRQgw0XJhgb/e95IRfJWhot6vVI9N4ygciGbXPd nm3MuKOGu9RH0zvpCqrHpF5u8LtHrJLTndmGWBu+gbZyS9dpw1ypL418suUgL1IMPtRS HE0cfLezpjmLzk31jHPCymkgScqAfqHIR3nUpAxAPmKWYvvrkjJ+b2JRuy2cQUOg9fl5 pIJP0Q06yhltPHRhS92wuOZ5tzfLRigov0ltLxcCfPms42AT05lEZMXm75txEAFzFPj1 m/4ZfYlGj1WvyJ0B/2SQPyeIzVASF0eN+PtTXkE0nySTxsAFugmjZC/Lu2Kaop9BfByh 6jhQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=3AU+//ukumQNIURdkuFGEGXbWbC6PNl6N342++9Bink=; b=qcjIWffmFJMMkwze+kFLwmL9fiHH45rDMFkdQ0pCnnOAxQzeXuoqBvpwQ5/q14AI7v pJ3yIXwvXPoDrFk/zDdsYFkYzeD+ZJ0tG0bXUJ2V22f/w941JndrdNt9raApDZZyEH0W CTiSdCiePgCPWWXw+y5RfK3L381qemLp10oWB4fgH4vHNDGKJk96iXicXpAcZSEs8lbZ LwEbc3wYOIzt30JId9ByYDNy3FRSOjZll/kKMuDRvS6a7a3eJtM9EY+8ul+BCQ4sn5lx gbZyTqE+3QwIXiP6+Md4iLaSMmVK0YMB4Svae3bgUX/E2i65YE3AvxfSPCOb6M70pBW9 lqEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531zb1CV2pfxNd4h7TQbkH00hLo9BHHo138c+IibQV7dOcqW2u4C ZJged7J/SDakQryCCeXuj3E=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxtbEQUn0GxD4VBSoI3kAvr0YAzdAUDO6R3N8YFj81A8wbA7qyTTXoc7MgrUbSrV38OU1v7sA==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:31c4:0:b029:28d:1ad0:340c with SMTP id x187-20020a6231c40000b029028d1ad0340cmr45794172pfx.35.1621011553502; Fri, 14 May 2021 09:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5600:5020:25f2:6a5c:8d81:dca9? ([2601:647:5600:5020:25f2:6a5c:8d81:dca9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h3sm2126908pfh.114.2021.05.14.09.59.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 May 2021 09:59:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <185C6A7C-D5D8-4FAB-BCBB-62525CBCBDDC@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_82B09E43-39EC-450A-86EE-E636B99D248E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 09:59:11 -0700
In-Reply-To: <609EA6A3.1040303@btconnect.com>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, babel-chairs <babel-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-babel-yang-model@ietf.org, babel@ietf.org
To: tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>
References: <161788580040.14525.8607775335520195175@ietfa.amsl.com> <607406F2.70500@btconnect.com> <BAD13FB1-2787-4DFF-ACD5-BB259FA0D43C@gmail.com> <609E4ED3.5010101@btconnect.com> <A42366E1-6C05-4E17-A371-66D6904B5BBF@gmail.com> <609EA6A3.1040303@btconnect.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/_JyoyYDPSIDKcqvgzi8gXiAhRS8>
Subject: Re: [babel] Last Call: <draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09.txt> (YANG Data Model for Babel) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 16:59:20 -0000

Hi Tom,

Are you suggesting that there should be no references to RFC numbers in the description statement? Note, the reference statement that follows the description statement has the complete reference to the RFC which is being cited in the description statement.

Cheers.

> On May 14, 2021, at 9:34 AM, tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com> wrote:
> 
> On 14/05/2021 17:17, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>> 
>> Can you point to something specific? Thanks.
> 
> 
> action reset
> ...[RFC ZZZZ]
> ...
> leaf value
> [RFC2104]...[RFC4868]... [RFC8697]...  [RFC7693]
> ...
> leaf value
> [RFC7468]
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>>> On May 14, 2021, at 3:20 AM, tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 12/05/2021 21:46, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
>>>> This has been addressed in -10 version of the draft. Cheers.
>>> 
>>> Indeed it has.
>>> 
>>> I note that some YANG clauses have [references] in them which are
>>> likely not plain text; doubtless that will be fixed at some point
>>> in the process.
>>> 
>>> Tom Petch
>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 12, 2021, at 1:38 AM, tom petch
>>>>> <daedulus@btconnect.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> This I-D introduces a new and unnecessary YANG prefix in
>>>>> defiance of BCP216 s.4.2.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It imports ietf-yang-types, perhaps the most widely imported
>>>>> module in the world, and RFC6991, where that module is
>>>>> specified, defines the proper prefix as 'yang'.  This I-D
>>>>> invents a different one. Technically, YANG can cope with this
>>>>> but that does not make it a sensible thing to do.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tom Petch
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 08/04/2021 13:43, The IESG wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The IESG has received a request from the Babel routing
>>>>>> protocol WG (babel) to consider the following document: -
>>>>>> 'YANG Data Model for Babel'
>>>>>> <draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09.txt> as Proposed Standard
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and
>>>>>> solicits final comments on this action. Please send
>>>>>> substantive comments to the last-call@ietf.org mailing lists
>>>>>> by 2021-04-22. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to
>>>>>> iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
>>>>>> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Abstract
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This document defines a data model for the Babel routing
>>>>>> protocol. The data model is defined using the YANG data
>>>>>> modeling language.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>> 
>> Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanandani@gmail.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com