Re: [babel] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-information-model-11: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 04 November 2020 03:49 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1D73A13A1; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 19:49:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EzWTvXJd6v5w; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 19:49:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk1-f171.google.com (mail-vk1-f171.google.com [209.85.221.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3264B3A139B; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 19:49:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk1-f171.google.com with SMTP id q77so768645vkq.1; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 19:49:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oCbuFmWg7WWQvpY3UjU1rtdr03aBaxg1MMxaVy68FSA=; b=N0fs5Phyy9Gtb+G6Y7i85Cu2Te16ofZM0TqlUWflxO0uW+k3ONVbTMYructZbmFw4W /I/2XyzC6XXK7rh/qFZDqyralm71NsbMf5FpUGx9skMyUb7Uq7EOnHngfP5YvjuA3xc2 6+r4vvFUlXjXaxkViMhRWtsLDXoqeO5D/EPWFzW2oVT2UtMDvrzZeuuUK3vXqebTiyW0 eVeFu0+AVxYVsVaAWT58vTePXmASWuT13T3j+BMCWkUaaiykVNDMszcbfbuSrV6hWNLk iPTrRotBhA6tiy2bS54hx2r8mNMErxLIutun0WyBQrp2SIqfKuvsgj2/ZEJjN2yHeo6T h5QQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531onVxbiICaChh0A5MuY2lRrxVcygWDfC2She2XFtq36AUTyU5n tNfnl5vvYn1svn+OrhqQYyUGtqnNpscCjjKg/Ls=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZGcbhjZpEjFBK5URGY28gJDQyeHp2y9YlOK60JB4ifSxtDxvr5bmqHdgBq/qndogwF1w32zbei/aLp8bIo5Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:2ad0:: with SMTP id q199mr19031214vkq.20.1604461783951; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 19:49:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160419457047.13941.8784738161520575163@ietfa.amsl.com> <183ee01e884f4c01aa7520b9ed48b061@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <183ee01e884f4c01aa7520b9ed48b061@att.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 22:49:32 -0500
Message-ID: <CALaySJLYhbvGtm2t-riRr0NXqdeo=RFM8wodiSZ=nSB=GsWaiw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
Cc: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "babel-chairs@ietf.org" <babel-chairs@ietf.org>, "babel@ietf.org" <babel@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-babel-information-model@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-babel-information-model@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b02f3405b33fde36"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/a_QXHMS82vxOdaj36Y6T-JboIF4>
Subject: Re: [babel] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-information-model-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 03:49:47 -0000

Thanks, Barbara.

Barry

On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 6:11 PM STARK, BARBARA H <bs7652@att.com> wrote:

> Hi Barry,
> Thanks for your review. I'll make both of the changes you suggest.
> Barbara
>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Just a couple of minor comments here:
> >
> > — Section 1.1 —
> > Please use the exact BCP 14 boilerplate from RFC 8174.
>
> I will change to use the exact BCP 14 boilerplate.
>
> > — Section 1.2 —
> > For “datetime”, I suggest adding “Section 5.6” to the reference to RFC
> 3339,
> > to
> > make the specific format easier to find.  And I think the use of 3339 in
> the
> > definition of the type makes it a normative reference.
>
> I will add Section 5.6 to the RFC 3339 reference.
>
> > Similarly, the use of ISO.10646 to define “string” makes it normative.
> >
> >
>
>