Re: [babel] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-babel-applicability-06

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Sun, 07 July 2019 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2522120048; Sun, 7 Jul 2019 07:26:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XDRDL9y_RSON; Sun, 7 Jul 2019 07:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F8F8120018; Sun, 7 Jul 2019 07:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id x67EQCgP031336; Sun, 7 Jul 2019 16:26:12 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524046FA11; Sun, 7 Jul 2019 16:26:15 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id FbMjHlwGv_O4; Sun, 7 Jul 2019 16:26:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62DF16FA0F; Sun, 7 Jul 2019 16:26:14 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 16:26:13 +0200
Message-ID: <878st9x6nu.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, babel@ietf.org, draft-ietf-babel-applicability.all@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <156142508331.17776.2290417666551756858@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <156142508331.17776.2290417666551756858@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Sun, 07 Jul 2019 16:26:12 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5D220104.003 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5D220104.003 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5D220104.003 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/d48D3wFfkm-JECKfuPsa35MN-hA>
Subject: Re: [babel] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-babel-applicability-06
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 14:26:19 -0000

Dear Joel,

Thank you very much for your kind review.

> Nits/editorial comments:
>    In section 2.2, in talking about "metric M", if I have understood properly,
>    I think it would be clearer if you referred to "metric value M".

This section has been expanded with human-readable text and a reference to
a research paper, and should therefore now be easier to understand.
I have, however, decided to follow the usual style of mathematical
writing, and have therefore chosen not to follow your advice.  I hope that
is okay.

Thanks again,

-- Juliusz