IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6-03

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Sun, 13 June 2021 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3D23A1EAB; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 08:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jK48TakZB3n6; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 08:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12e.google.com (mail-il1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EBAD3A1EA2; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 08:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id i17so10031697ilj.11; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 08:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=adoJdknondssdp5tNoAwGMUKd5VpW2GWkq6AXEnBHuw=; b=Ue8kyTgFtTtv6aGvFOsarR4VmaUkAI1odLbaAXgyDSOqIAN6mCiY1JQqLYJrjEeZzu t0PIAq/JU2jUcOyrn7p29Yz0eNPFoDur3HcZlqi6XsB71/ekgFW1oYJBLehODZis8/xR AoDq+H2ourAK/p23VPKLLLiNxUbsHngM8VOGCiQi77jvSjZznxsCE080IL+lAyibQqUd yKoFQas1k8TifmDeWcqIOUzCvUXD72Q+0KaQoYrlmbVV81pofyJsGXp9y22v39F9Angk lvppHxiAKc1G8x2EaVo6VWF82cOyuYwdPlPu8RokiLYOoLNIzFL77R7Y1YNM6ZCbbldY H4BA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=adoJdknondssdp5tNoAwGMUKd5VpW2GWkq6AXEnBHuw=; b=I6nn1RMotoyXJpINZDDez7a/tHxa8WxGbMqdXqm0BfR574l/mpE0yvB1C4IGkd3Omk zBCp8E+lerEsKa1nOvp9G+MeFCYE2u2ZbKfxU6lvvuo0HVkIXw38aeGCdos0op1jEDsU asovrscd/E2Hrp+GbGwoDo25VJDXnJjeEpVD6gBIhuXwhdSOxFgbaprQDM9KLnMAzreb e0AbwMiZRj1L5Md3bqO6prlz3M9Wk4T1ZhYj/pFfn3zgRS7G3VcMnn7g2dAhNGxJkeIg EeXZukWKUHjMX5xVw/VG4A9MQCQhVS9g8LwFtNa/0Eh1h7Vvo6NsaP0/6+9Z9Hxo4uK3 Ix2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533uEewIEVzk5+HLmw+1fB5XNAIcA8bPnenns9N/oJwMhPftN+AV XbVP052m0zABlpcGKUiYJoThn614YSRYx6VEn9s=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzDdeYHFWLlGYsZGzhwmUW9S/30on91JqF0i28whenxli6JdvsaY4SVe3fHhUlGAS9KkvAGwhEcLIgOWTYZsvc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1068:: with SMTP id q8mr10999611ilj.276.1623598736448; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 08:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAF4+nEGXt+x6BsQNuXwL7MMgChEB574=dW77_y71XMoL_J1rBw@mail.gmail.com> <87v96nyzsv.wl-jch@irif.fr> <CAF4+nEHjmxKggg0S21QK=7rYVaQvb4xiVG+jaJEKV0PE928rzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEHF72Z+GJPsSuTRSNeWCcJ=ePyS2bwCDb_nM6nhbsF7-A@mail.gmail.com> <87tum2dkzz.wl-jch@irif.fr>
In-Reply-To: <87tum2dkzz.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 11:38:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEH7xpJ9WmAZdxxTCEO3pov-tveG4jvZ7K6s-4dkO6kWcQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
Cc: Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>, babel-chairs <babel-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/eGVNXH9BPEUfNSZU7jgBwQRXocA>
Subject: Re: [babel] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6-03
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 15:40:10 -0000

Hi Juliusz,

On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 8:09 AM Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:
>
> > I think the simplest thing would be to remove the "Updates: 8966" header from
> > the first page.
>
> If that's okay with you, I'd rather add the mention.  It's useful to be
> able to see related drafts on the datatracker.

OK, then you need to add something like "This document updates RFC
8966." to the Abstract, probably at the end, and "This document
updates [RFC8966]." somewhere in the Introduction.

> (IMHO, there should be a "Relates-to" relation for RFCs, to make the
> datatracker more useful.)

You are not alone in believing that the "Updates" header should be
augmented by the availability of something like an "Extends" header. I
think a "Relates-to" header is a bit too vague and judgemental. But
this issue has been around for years now so I wouldn't expect a change
any time soon.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email