Re: [babel] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6-03

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Sun, 13 June 2021 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BFCD3A183A; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 05:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YDGFc3FlLdLW; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 05:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DA923A1834; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 05:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id 15DC9MUC000590; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 14:09:22 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DDD8D30BE; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 14:09:22 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id 11drnbTg5mnk; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 14:09:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B74EBD30BA; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 14:09:20 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 14:09:20 +0200
Message-ID: <87tum2dkzz.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Cc: Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>, babel-chairs <babel-chairs@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEHF72Z+GJPsSuTRSNeWCcJ=ePyS2bwCDb_nM6nhbsF7-A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF4+nEGXt+x6BsQNuXwL7MMgChEB574=dW77_y71XMoL_J1rBw@mail.gmail.com> <87v96nyzsv.wl-jch@irif.fr> <CAF4+nEHjmxKggg0S21QK=7rYVaQvb4xiVG+jaJEKV0PE928rzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEHF72Z+GJPsSuTRSNeWCcJ=ePyS2bwCDb_nM6nhbsF7-A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/28.0 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Sun, 13 Jun 2021 14:09:22 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 60C5F572.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 60C5F572.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 60C5F572.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/fALZ7gChmFERL4s3LsbRwAGSIc8>
Subject: Re: [babel] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6-03
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 12:09:28 -0000

> I think the simplest thing would be to remove the "Updates: 8966" header from
> the first page.

If that's okay with you, I'd rather add the mention.  It's useful to be
able to see related drafts on the datatracker.

(IMHO, there should be a "Relates-to" relation for RFCs, to make the
datatracker more useful.)