Re: [babel] Protocol Action: 'Delay-based Metric Extension for the Babel Routing Protocol' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension-07.txt)

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Tue, 23 April 2024 20:16 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <171389644965.43859.12734250974165382624@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <171389644965.43859.12734250974165382624@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 16:16:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEHPRg=H+K9oC8HN1ugob=xhcxiNqjGmgQu-11dDHxXc1w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: babel-chairs@ietf.org, babel@ietf.org, draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension@ietf.org, gunter@vandevelde.cc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/mNxhb9ZL9uy7qsA1IkAK48wPDJY>
Subject: Re: [babel] Protocol Action: 'Delay-based Metric Extension for the Babel Routing Protocol' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension-07.txt)
Precedence: list

Congratulations everyone on getting this document through!

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 2:20 PM The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> The IESG has approved the following document:
> - 'Delay-based Metric Extension for the Babel Routing Protocol'
>   (draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension-07.txt) as Proposed Standard
>
> This document is the product of the Babel routing protocol Working Group.
>
> The IESG contact persons are Gunter Van de Velde, Jim Guichard and John
> Scudder.
>
> A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension/
>
>
>
>
> Technical Summary
>
>    This document defines an extension to the Babel routing protocol that
>    measures the round-trip time (RTT) between routers and makes it
>    possible to prefer lower latency links over higher latency ones.
>
> Working Group Summary
>
>    Was there anything in the WG process that is worth noting?
>    For example, was there controversy about particular points
>    or were there decisions where the consensus was
>    particularly rough?
>
> There seemed to be solid consensus on this document
>
> Document Quality
>
>    Are there existing implementations of the protocol?  Have a
>    significant number of vendors indicated their plan to
>    implement the specification?  Are there any reviewers that
>    merit special mention as having done a thorough review,
>    e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a
>    conclusion that the document had no substantive issues?  If
>    there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review,
>    what was its course (briefly)?  In the case of a Media Type
>    Review, on what date was the request posted?
>
> There are reported implementations of this draft.
>
> Personnel
>
>    The Document Shepherd for this document is Donald E. Eastlake 3rd. The
>    Responsible Area Director is Andrew Alston.

[babel] Protocol Action: 'Delay-based Metric Exte… The IESG
Re: [babel] Protocol Action: 'Delay-based Metric … Donald Eastlake