Re: [babel] Shepherd Review of draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-04

[Juliusz Chroboczek <[e-mail]>]

> Section 6, page 7, first parenthetical:
>    I think instead of "and all of its extensions" it should say something a bit
> more limited. How about "and all previously standardized extensions"?

Done.

> Section 7, page 8, 2nd paragraph:
>    Generally, cases where different routers can interpret routing protocol
> messages differently make me very nervous. It is almost always possible to
> construct a situation where this causes persistent looping. It seems to me that
> you need to unambiguously specify what is done if there is a malformed TLV with
> multiple Source Prefix sub-TLVs. Such TLVs could always be ignored or the first
> or the last Source Prefix sut-TLV could be the effective sub-TLV with other
> Source Prefix sub-TLVs ignored. But whatever is specified, it needs to be
> mandatory unambiguous behavior.

Done.

> Section 7.1, Page 9:
>    What do you do when you get a malformed Source Prefix sub-TLV with a zero
> Source Plen?

Done.  This leads to some repetition (the case of wildcard requests and
retractions was already specified in Section 5.2), but what the hell.

> Typos:

Done.

> Minor textural comments:
> ===================
>    These are just minor cases where I think the draft would read slightly
> better with a wording change.

Done.

Thanks for your help,

-- Juliusz