IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-babel-dtls

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Fri, 09 November 2018 11:42 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86060130DFB for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 03:42:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y3c2Zf7AvBiE for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 03:42:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5433E130DEB for <babel@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 03:42:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id wA9Bgj2g031257; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 12:42:45 +0100
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC70E62014; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 12:42:51 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id pa_lnpXE_BIJ; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 12:42:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42A8462012; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 12:42:49 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 12:42:49 +0100
Message-ID: <87in165veu.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>
Cc: Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>, Antonin Décimo <antonin.decimo@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <877ehnru8p.fsf@taht.net>
References: <CAF4+nEG98aaq+Q34=O4vkqDkC2qFCTMbsRxiMF6FAK5QStcpqw@mail.gmail.com> <877ehnru8p.fsf@taht.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Fri, 09 Nov 2018 12:42:46 +0100 (CET)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5BE572B5.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5BE572B5.002 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5BE572B5.002 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/ng7YFQmVBXZNT96HhAaYL_YdIEg>
Subject: Re: [babel] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-babel-dtls
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 11:42:56 -0000

>> This message begins a Working Group Last Call for
>> draft-ietf-babel-dtls-01 running through November 26th. Please
>> indicate whether you think this draft is ready for publication as an
>> RFC. Comments on the draft are also welcome.

> Is there more than one public implementation at this point?

I think there's actually none right now -- Antonin's code does not comply
with the latest draft (it sends IHUs in the clear, and accepts unprotected
IHUs), while David's code is lost for posterity.

We (Antonin, David and me) have spent a lot of time last summer exploring
the design space, so I'm not particularly concerned, but I agree we should
make at least one compliant implementation publicly available.

-- Juliusz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email