IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] I-D Action: draft-ietf-babel-information-model-14.txt

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Wed, 17 March 2021 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9C53A1153 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wO1cjoAg3A-N for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42e.google.com (mail-pf1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2531B3A1152 for <babel@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id x184so1749435pfd.6 for <babel@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=pH0/mRHsye8kgGdAHQNW5f0IixI7XwD4GHaeOqUwKgo=; b=M80nJcE5PM4qErZJkdszHZy98vwAH7FDlp+Aj1LJWXisjo8Z8bwmBnKOMPcEGdH+jR txNUJ6627wQB/a4SPhxc+Z9AqBGT9p20t1t9FeAEC72D6NOO1O+JbJM6so0hTaAh7sX5 UUp0Z5tS1ayah4TxOnRDmQnb5VtzzqjyThlaXh4SV53v2SwtvnDjW0eiWA4+6S0gpCYD 4dTXlufhc1vgZpb8HXDZiMxheh8BiCYvUK8ONNmb8NXdkNvi61WSmZ3DSxFEHiM2ZNkW gi/eA/3N392KFTrAB3xAwKOH3X+S7BQa2YcwO9/+TJAJZRoFYQuKEE04Yc/YCjJhsklk oKIA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=pH0/mRHsye8kgGdAHQNW5f0IixI7XwD4GHaeOqUwKgo=; b=CC0BaXWg3e6/bJ1XFI8zDlEbPxO5hMFJQAQO+LNw6beHdH0lvrcDbIhm82QHWdKIuz XsB7Z18zcpNJWK7yXAQin0rO0iLwGI7ziUaZ4bw8uYSoniDYFHAyEFI08GU1e/sGjG5A 9V3gTzVp3cWpT6eFTFWhsfiuXrKnCBRF+ZZOPWQvfZQN69Dij79NS6w4qs+hDEQqrOMf HSU7igwEp9HgmPlw13YlLlX/2xxEoG5DR8/cY+OLO8xMVp4FdkluagXqi8qoUOb066E4 aJpdwFwcYGjt5NkSXsWYvBNpUiI7j/en56x2fC8Fnv5hwkEqXid2c6H2TmV792f34jIl LRiw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531SKd6qhUREX0Z2kJrIEm/A+812eNDn0yEl3ZDSlTjZ6c0k/Lm6 uYVJ93aou+oGJNIf5QYSDKQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz8abV9X9qKsIsMJhOnHXqe9DRrfYtGXab+XmIvfGzlM2RzcihBQbA/rmmw0qWO7f0PqOcUxg==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:4085:: with SMTP id t5mr3837216pgp.208.1616006584099; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5600:5020:e834:82e3:cfdc:e68d? ([2601:647:5600:5020:e834:82e3:cfdc:e68d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h6sm20352400pfb.157.2021.03.17.11.43.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <E7B6E07B-E2CB-431E-AA2D-32D9FD6685BF@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_40318E41-0EAC-48F1-84BD-1725E034ED86"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:43:00 -0700
In-Reply-To: <DB6PR0701MB242336F44E65A93B7A51E46ECE6A9@DB6PR0701MB2423.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "babel@ietf.org" <babel@ietf.org>, "barbara.stark@att.com" <barbara.stark@att.com>
To: tom petch <ietfid@btconnect.com>
References: <161551207042.13956.2933636104479614348@ietfa.amsl.com> <DB6PR0701MB24239BBACDDB224B2913B564CE6B9@DB6PR0701MB2423.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <08369846-F3CD-444E-84D5-D9B47CDFB6AB@gmail.com> <DB6PR0701MB242336F44E65A93B7A51E46ECE6A9@DB6PR0701MB2423.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/nibURRZ0xks9g_7JUE76dnItHNY>
Subject: Re: [babel] I-D Action: draft-ietf-babel-information-model-14.txt
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:43:08 -0000

Hi Tom,

What is the definition of “proper module” prefix?

RFC 7950 says

       "All prefixes, including the prefix for the module itself, MUST be
       unique within the module or submodule.

which is true with this module.

Thanks.

> On Mar 17, 2021, at 5:07 AM, tom petch <ietfid@btconnect.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
> Sent: 17 March 2021 03:41
> 
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Mar 16, 2021, at 4:41 AM, tom petch <ietfid@btconnect.com<mailto:ietfid@btconnect.com>> wrote:
> 
> In passing, imports of IETF modules must use the prefix specified in the RFC which the import of ietf-yang-types here does not.
> 
> I understand that for readability reasons, the prefix defined in the imported module should be used. But it is not wrong to define a different prefix, and no tool will flag it if you choose a different prefix. In any case, the “prefix” statement has a local scope, and is used for accessing definitions inside the imported module, and has no impact on the imported module.
> 
> <tp>
> RFC8407
>  o  The proper module prefix MUST be used for all identifiers imported
>      from other modules.
> 
> I thought that it said for IETF modules but no, it is all imports that must use the proper module prefux.
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> Mahesh Jethanandani
> mjethanandani@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status