Re: [babel] AD review of draft-ietf-babel-information-model

David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 17 September 2020 00:31 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F1A3A011D; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1QRHTvklWtmW; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com (mail-lf1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E42443A0115; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:31:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id z19so212445lfr.4; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:31:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HP5Oi/H2zMrjv2HPpRiy4Affru+uaQw67NmCIGjMuCY=; b=C8oJRbxUr4g2XvCWeZDQJ/DFCLXGgxRgNAQPmvgba8C6NMnD6IX30B7aTbULyaIkNe WK1n5B7HzvQGh7Wq3UrKBNi1LOdLAyh9Fg23ZdIeWNyC+yA2hAbwso9P0tLVO0tFenu+ k09Y3K1Q7g7k4jH7mzAiZIUtkTOLtcX7OB9Qc+6mPrxkYZ2napeDiIFn5jRTfq/ulzZ5 9yTnPlGMlbr4TcBke3v6L1zYrmjUH0MGphHwqeb7BZN2WaatoQejCOOXvP8AjS99LpXl yaquXb3v8W5oy9IG8cgDvtbQ6dt6mjxTaNQV+J0ZuuDyFNIjJ/BaLL4URvsDCGdAzFm4 IIGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HP5Oi/H2zMrjv2HPpRiy4Affru+uaQw67NmCIGjMuCY=; b=NHjpQQ3umTQcgrhkQQ/fQsfNarmX/wErdBDWBDYYMiLpcs5CC6joLuhf7Fr0+Z9u+c G8S3lP8rp2Ij8mayVM876ilMVtqkVBeySigZ93EGURHZUOOLNruY8lr9c64XWdZ7txQV o//RgG5Se84lzatb5LWuCrKW3C4vFJiNRYVRfbxgOvgL+7hV5/tEfFTwZA1JaKNCfLXK W+77JEbjsFMbc8/tgbrH0CA5imzlKQmOnlVvJeEr1Aj6Joy2oG8v48vLivP0o4NcYGX8 IExdyKv8Nnt+OWKmC1nZYnM88XC0PFHW+gpHCGoe2kAvg0vOe1R/u96F416ON4qtQWNr 3LPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531KuZOxtvzBMjKqq1Co3XBF8gZ2r57Qj7trnlMDJ3Sr08XWN4TR TMMRiymhJy7eM6vrLfwzf7frSdFSZjOJuUOlH/M=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXLLsr2YzWQPVz/o+Tp59wzk+tckghTPiC61Y0kU7NW6q4y58hNVJTQT1sy9velgcmvKd8F8wjk2HMkj8IVaY=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:4319:: with SMTP id q25mr7276423lfa.505.1600302681893; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <57d1a7c8-de0d-9713-f585-33934eeff2d0@nokia.com> <fcd2cc592b6f4bd7863230af84a1ff8b@att.com> <a9b66e93ced242778d12692e7ba463c7@att.com> <87wo0tnyjh.fsf@toke.dk>
In-Reply-To: <87wo0tnyjh.fsf@toke.dk>
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:31:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+789XrF7_mOgbz_QkJRuxaFLupK3J8Fneq3RXbjHLFPxg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke=40toke.dk@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, "draft-ietf-babel-information-model@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-babel-information-model@ietf.org>, Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e32ead05af7780cd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/p3g8beJcZvfbol_pAVwTlLWDyuI>
Subject: Re: [babel] AD review of draft-ietf-babel-information-model
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:31:27 -0000

Indeed, I wasn't on the previous email lists :-)
I never got around to implementing source-specific
Babel in my own implementation, so I don't have a
helpful opinion here, sorry.

David

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 3:32 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke=
40toke.dk@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> writes:
>
> > Hi David and Juliusz (and anyone else who cares to opine),
> > In contemplating your unnatural silence, I realized you weren't on any
> of the lists included in this thread.
> > The basic question is whether we need config parameters for
> source-specific routing. At the
> > very least, I wonder if there should be an enable/disable?
>
> In the Bird implementation it does have to be explicitly enabled (or
> rather, there's a config section per address familiy, which can be one
> or more of {ipv4,ipv6,ipv6-ss}).
>
> -Toke
>
> _______________________________________________
> babel mailing list
> babel@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel
>