Re: [babel] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Mirja Kühlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Wed, 08 January 2020 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8F0120052; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 09:31:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xBdU9puOBk7U; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 09:31:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5151B1208A2; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 09:31:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ip-109-42-1-106.web.vodafone.de ([109.42.1.106] helo=[100.95.76.202]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1ipFBO-0007vC-5c; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 18:31:50 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: =?utf-8?Q?"Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind_=28IETF=29"?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 18:31:48 +0100
Message-Id: <C220445B-C26A-4EC5-B4F2-D5760E1865BC@kuehlewind.net>
References: <E85F24AF-D4D5-4D34-867D-88AB38510EB7@kuehlewind.net>
Cc: "draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis@ietf.org>, Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl>, Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <E85F24AF-D4D5-4D34-867D-88AB38510EB7@kuehlewind.net>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17C54)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1578504714;848e5e04;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1ipFBO-0007vC-5c
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/pQbtJwq0NvPDHxgR7Ck_yeGDwn4>
Subject: Re: [babel] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_Discuss_on_draft-ietf?= =?utf-8?q?-babel-rfc6126bis-12=3A_=28with_DISCUSS_and_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 17:31:56 -0000

Hi again,

Please also note that changes you already did are good (maybe with the exception of adding the second set of example parameters which we are still discussing here) and they  address already part of my discuss. 

Also note that Alvaro also still has a discuss on the document which is also related to default parameters. Unfortunately I have the feeling we don’t make any further progress about this point in the discussion right and would therefore like to rely on Martin as the responsible AD for further advise.

Mirja 


> Am 08.01.2020 um 18:13 schrieb Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>et>:
> 
> Hi Juliusz,
> 
> You didn’t make any concrete proposals for changes that I could commit to.
> 
> Mirja
> 
> 
> 
>>> On 8. Jan 2020, at 18:08, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:
>>> 
>>> As explained already e.g OSPF has a limit because all interval values
>>> are in units of seconds, however, this is not the case here.
>> 
>> I refer you to my mail of 17 December 2019 where I explain why this is not
>> the case.
>> 
>>> I have the feeling you are just unwilling to make any further changes to
>>> the document,
>> 
>> Over the last six months, Mirja, I have made dozens of changes, many of
>> which I don't feel improve the text at all.
>> 
>> What I'm unwilling to do is to break the structure of the document in
>> order to adress a problem that is purely hypothetical, and with no
>> commitment that you will actually clear your objection after I do that.
>> 
>> -- Juliusz
>> 
>> 
> 
>