[babel] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-10: (with COMMENT)
Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 19 May 2021 06:42 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: babel@ietf.org
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB363A1428; Tue, 18 May 2021 23:42:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-babel-yang-model@ietf.org, babel-chairs@ietf.org, babel@ietf.org, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, d3e3e3@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.29.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <162140653428.10531.12882764411636560226@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 23:42:14 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/qHU_bAqDp16qph21E0q2JL2KAwI>
Subject: [babel] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 06:42:15 -0000
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-babel-yang-model/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you Mahesh for the YANG syntax information, it is clear that the PYANG tool is plain wrong. I have cleared my DISCUSS position (but keeping the text below for archive purpose), I also noted that you replied/acted upon my original COMMENT Regards -éric --- Start of archive (to be ignored) --- Thank you for the work put into this document. I really like the fact that the information model is built before the data model. Congratulations ! Please find below one blocking (but trivial to fix) DISCUSS point, some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be appreciated), and one nit. Thank you to Donald Eastlake for his shepherd's write-up (including the WG consensus). I hope that this helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric == DISCUSS == The YANG module does not compile correctly with PYANG, it should be easy to fix though :-) See: https://yangcatalog.org/results/ietf-babel@2021-05-12_ietf.html Or is it a PYANG error ? == COMMENTS == The related links on should be updated. E.g., the YANG catalog entry should be: https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/module_details.php?module=ietf-babel@2021-05-12 -- Section 2.2 -- I usually use the expanded tree view rather the YANG module itself to get a global view. Is there any reason why the full tree view is not included? -- Section 5 -- Is there any reason why the doc shepherd is not acknowledged ? == NITS == -- Section 2.3 -- s/MAC based security/MAC-based security/ ?
- [babel] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker