Re: [babel] AD review of draft-ietf-babel-information-model

"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> Wed, 16 September 2020 22:06 UTC

Return-Path: <bs7652@att.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D4D3A0D74; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VpusBV1LUe9n; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A22B03A0A9B; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049459.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049459.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08GM1AIE041119; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:06:45 -0400
Received: from alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp6.sbc.com [144.160.229.23]) by m0049459.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 33k5suw62r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:06:45 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 08GM6iIK029524; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:06:45 -0400
Received: from zlp30486.vci.att.com (zlp30486.vci.att.com [135.47.91.177]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 08GM6cdM029252 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:06:39 -0400
Received: from zlp30486.vci.att.com (zlp30486.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30486.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 41CEF4009E6B; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 22:06:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from GAALPA1MSGEX1CE.ITServices.sbc.com (unknown [135.50.89.112]) by zlp30486.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTPS id 2339F4009E61; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 22:06:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from GAALPA1MSGEX1CB.ITServices.sbc.com (135.50.89.109) by GAALPA1MSGEX1CE.ITServices.sbc.com (135.50.89.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2044.4; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:06:37 -0400
Received: from GAALPA1MSGEX1CB.ITServices.sbc.com ([135.50.89.109]) by GAALPA1MSGEX1CB.ITServices.sbc.com ([135.50.89.109]) with mapi id 15.01.2044.004; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:06:37 -0400
From: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
To: 'Martin Vigoureux' <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, "'draft-ietf-babel-information-model@ietf.org'" <draft-ietf-babel-information-model@ietf.org>
CC: Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD review of draft-ietf-babel-information-model
Thread-Index: AQHWis8s0dN/AYF6b0m6XBswORf8JaloiNNAgANLxWA=
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 22:06:37 +0000
Message-ID: <a9b66e93ced242778d12692e7ba463c7@att.com>
References: <57d1a7c8-de0d-9713-f585-33934eeff2d0@nokia.com> <fcd2cc592b6f4bd7863230af84a1ff8b@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <fcd2cc592b6f4bd7863230af84a1ff8b@att.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.10.78.247]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-16_13:2020-09-16, 2020-09-16 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=786 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009160158
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/q_0NXXMk1QIY7tZPKQktOV03kDc>
Subject: Re: [babel] AD review of draft-ietf-babel-information-model
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 22:06:48 -0000

Hi David and Juliusz (and anyone else who cares to opine),
In contemplating your unnatural silence, I realized you weren't on any of the lists included in this thread.
The basic question is whether we need config parameters for source-specific routing. At the
very least, I wonder if there should be an enable/disable?
Thx,
Barbara

> Hi Martin,
> Thanks for the question. It's an excellent question.
> Digging through my fuzzy memory banks, I seem to recall it was said there
> were no additional parameters that needed to be configured. What I don't
> remember (and maybe we missed discussing this?) is whether there should
> be a parameter to enable/disable source-specific routing.
> 
> David and Juliusz, do either of you remember? Or have an opinion on source-
> specific routing configuration?
> Thx,
> Barbara
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
> > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 2:42 PM
> > To: draft-ietf-babel-information-model@ietf.org
> > Cc: babel-chairs <babel-chairs@ietf.org>
> > Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-babel-information-model
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > thank you for this document. I happily don't have any comment or
> > suggestion to make. However I do have a question.
> >
> > You don't seem to cover the source specific routing aspects that are
> > introduced in draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-05.
> > Why?
> >
> > Thanks
> > -m