IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] John Scudder's No Record on draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-10: (with COMMENT)

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Thu, 13 May 2021 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5FE3A0DC1; Thu, 13 May 2021 12:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qj5IlgM2MHwJ; Thu, 13 May 2021 12:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x533.google.com (mail-pg1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0487B3A0DB8; Thu, 13 May 2021 12:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x533.google.com with SMTP id c21so22407909pgg.3; Thu, 13 May 2021 12:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=H6+99Rjr0tDdmyduAVU+Ev6Oaoi3TeRvIJq6CeiFbjQ=; b=Yi9y/tvyCZsOS9St8OjXtIEKvbcz6tjyTnQMjHAVkjlVPu8JdyIVEbrXuyw+Z3zNCV es10QyHDR5ECm2e7JMoaMtWF2pxWRWdA76DUAZcnvSMr/QWPpX1OimptuNXhbAtQxby4 5/vAqhLVvvg2XaPbxHhncAhRV0Vk8meZU+5hCZQgCSWZXDt0+/esxNA4noYtI/mmoF2Q URX53pN44rVZGgLd5Zn4ohmhBxKaqwEZYySeiX4pG9JHvg45mhcc9fD0zxurETnqwr5k fga52c/qEC1EcVeIDjFMHmCaB0JHAlCwsFA8ATC2cBS8/lmxPkuIMTuPSgBs7ZOVTPis kjgA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=H6+99Rjr0tDdmyduAVU+Ev6Oaoi3TeRvIJq6CeiFbjQ=; b=H6jO54XmCObkU5v14npcUF6YvSr4oKaJ4bxpyGpVX9J01N+r0W8JrhZbuGh/SeHyBa GZTL4oVXs/mDcBwJpCW8sx9/N9Y45kuz5VJODxkg2WPF7fe24EUjwjtPzx8taXEQPipc FB5irbMz9v7or3is7cGtOZ1tZXsIAiY7U9f7787jvV6kXXWaLgW3DC4RTojBJ9dFcsao fH1zwjyAt7jSmYxq3vw5Ptc81TTMkIQwMFazgzjyz2GtnNBRugNQTAnZWEuoCPaT9+Bt qp26V92g6lPWWOAfzF0P4msmQSbzzZLnWcuGdyRgaiB3qb1dnN5qUtc9N/Z/DsKQ25gQ WFmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Xm5SwduPCIng9vs4M8bZc30fQmEn0CjGGS3iEiDRSHk1WBSZO pRA58wgfW+5ACSZfzRtvMFQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxtm+azF9TILbs3uzn29YFtDmL/U/quNefvyMXIkm+q9tQn+XSLHrJGdy2kX1bnNg897A62vg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:a552:: with SMTP id r18mr12646190pgu.439.1620935067675; Thu, 13 May 2021 12:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5600:5020:e9d0:b7e0:1e2c:2ca5? ([2601:647:5600:5020:e9d0:b7e0:1e2c:2ca5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v130sm2593305pfc.25.2021.05.13.12.44.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 May 2021 12:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <474E50C2-7835-4406-9FE6-1C59293A28BD@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0AEA18B2-E644-4343-8D3E-761ED4D70597"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 12:44:25 -0700
In-Reply-To: <e34c2415-a36b-c5c7-3da2-b331f2fe6a8c@nokia.com>
Cc: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, babel-chairs <babel-chairs@ietf.org>, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-babel-yang-model@ietf.org, babel@ietf.org
To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
References: <162092082278.7424.7836678134954594030@ietfa.amsl.com> <e34c2415-a36b-c5c7-3da2-b331f2fe6a8c@nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/v3w0v8RyMY-OypF4_ksmjdzcH50>
Subject: Re: [babel] John Scudder's No Record on draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 19:44:34 -0000

Hi John/Martin,

I have fixed this here. 

https://github.com/mjethanandani/babel-data-model/pull/30/commits/6e92cfa9932f43964e6d7db6f6103b13636c90f2 <https://github.com/mjethanandani/babel-data-model/pull/30/commits/6e92cfa9932f43964e6d7db6f6103b13636c90f2>

I am expecting more comments, so I am holding on publishing v11 at this time. If you disagree, let me know and I can publish v11.

> On May 13, 2021, at 9:04 AM, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com> wrote:
> 
> Thank you John
> that's strange.
> I'm pretty sure everything was fine on 09 as I looked yesterday few hours before I submitted the ballot. I was waiting for v10.
> But I have to admit that I didn't look again at the yang checks on v10 before pressing the button.
> 
> Looking at the diff it seems fairly easy to address.
> 
> -m
> 
> Le 2021-05-13 à 17:47, John Scudder via Datatracker a écrit :
>> John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-10: No Record
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-babel-yang-model/
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> At the moment, the automated check is returning errors:
>> ietf-babel@2021-05-12.yang:148: error: keyword "if-feature" not in canonical
>> order (see RFC 6020, Section 12) ietf-babel@2021-05-12.yang:157: error: keyword
>> "if-feature" not in canonical order (see RFC 6020, Section 12)
>> ietf-babel@2021-05-12.yang:175: error: keyword "if-feature" not in canonical
>> order (see RFC 6020, Section 12) ietf-babel@2021-05-12.yang:176: error: keyword
>> "if-feature" not in canonical order (see RFC 6020, Section 12)
>> ietf-babel@2021-05-12.yang:186: error: keyword "if-feature" not in canonical
>> order (see RFC 6020, Section 12) ietf-babel@2021-05-12.yang:187: error: keyword
>> "if-feature" not in canonical order (see RFC 6020, Section 12)
>> ietf-babel@2021-05-12.yang:206: error: keyword "if-feature" not in canonical
>> order (see RFC 6020, Section 12) ietf-babel@2021-05-12.yang:207: error: keyword
>> "if-feature" not in canonical order (see RFC 6020, Section 12)
>> ietf-babel@2021-05-12.yang:214: error: keyword "if-feature" not in canonical
>> order (see RFC 6020, Section 12) ietf-babel@2021-05-12.yang:215: error: keyword
>> "if-feature" not in canonical order (see RFC 6020, Section 12)

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email