IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Banana] Reaching Consensus on Problem Statement

Martyn Russell <martyn.russell@sharedband.com> Wed, 01 March 2017 12:17 UTC

Return-Path: <martyn.russell@sharedband.com>
X-Original-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CAB129545 for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 04:17:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sbuk.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PPUXi1Rg8ZLy for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 04:17:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-ve1eur01on0091.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.1.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F38D3129999 for <banana@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 04:17:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbuk.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-Sharedband-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=B6n81VsKA/pAKn7g57NLl7Io5stQJ0sxOaHBZKyx00k=; b=MXjmbC4kW64zJ/fI2kig+smk8eDZ9xXqUVknSHA26/g9Nv4VA6nWKcFyGVAlQQooInaYVErM+PmyzrAG4FQKpqDPyOV3NNKKSZLhdYC92Dc5Em+vz+hB32ILGVF5wubcm29pUD0GhzNVwb2teR2mwN/coK92rh+9GikSq9wMo3I=
Received: from AM4PR0501MB2193.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.165.82.12) by AM4PR0501MB2193.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.165.82.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.933.12; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:17:12 +0000
Received: from AM4PR0501MB2193.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.165.82.12]) by AM4PR0501MB2193.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.165.82.12]) with mapi id 15.01.0933.020; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:17:12 +0000
From: Martyn Russell <martyn.russell@sharedband.com>
To: Margaret Cullen <margaretw42@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Banana] Reaching Consensus on Problem Statement
Thread-Index: AQHSfXQ5Fx+fijdDCEWk0VPMrtvkBKGAEJmA
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 12:17:11 +0000
Message-ID: <C917DAD4-9502-4017-B81A-A5323D32C10A@sharedband.com>
References: <EE162993-F96F-458A-846C-D722EEF7A3B8@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <EE162993-F96F-458A-846C-D722EEF7A3B8@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=sharedband.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [37.34.69.147]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3919eb80-5c45-49ac-e6d7-08d4609ce3e7
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001); SRVR:AM4PR0501MB2193;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM4PR0501MB2193; 7:UPubPHC8A8oyWrXxJ3+PF8yCab8FHVsKTgYlCbVYl0NXibcwMEUleS4k2tDnGO7QqLpjuKHbXJAba2RIkiMqHzANCnyqgoe/KLuFAEvxPA7qu0lDPInx69sTndTXc28VJe+hujZ7v1k62pVYIb/UOkPDYbkadpIp/psIi4WNY0eXaJAE4mvPFfbI7KBm8XBytjHKGncj/y9HVyofvPsfbrrIjEZX6JbDFueXYVUJ98fK9S57DeBfM3mF6uoRayl7M5rm7Oo9ibo+xMEVuHqF0b4MWDPGt1CoBqypDLaGRii1ceRQG2hesiUB3CxPgvYPTLTdJnC286gBjDHdQcVldA==
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM4PR0501MB2193D4AAFBEE6B69930E1C60E4290@AM4PR0501MB2193.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(100405760836317);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6041248)(2016111802025)(20161123558025)(20161123564025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(20161123562025)(6072148)(6043046); SRVR:AM4PR0501MB2193; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM4PR0501MB2193;
x-forefront-prvs: 0233768B38
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(39830400002)(39410400002)(39450400003)(38564003)(6246003)(38730400002)(86362001)(189998001)(66066001)(53376002)(39060400002)(966004)(92566002)(110136004)(3846002)(6116002)(77096006)(6486002)(54356999)(53936002)(33656002)(102836003)(50986999)(6916009)(345774005)(2950100002)(76176999)(5660300001)(106116001)(3280700002)(229853002)(6306002)(7736002)(6512007)(3660700001)(8676002)(99286003)(2906002)(81166006)(1411001)(36756003)(4326008)(122556002)(25786008)(6506006)(6436002)(8936002)(83716003)(305945005)(82746002)(2900100001)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM4PR0501MB2193; H:AM4PR0501MB2193.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <0911259228A2F645AF69716908CE9A43@eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: Sharedband.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Mar 2017 12:17:11.8170 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 6ab1932d-4f24-4fd6-bb68-deea31d0dbe3
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM4PR0501MB2193
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/banana/2TTn3n-UpYJdhSIptRWLRKHV_Gs>
Cc: "banana@ietf.org" <banana@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Banana] Reaching Consensus on Problem Statement
X-BeenThere: banana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Bandwidth Aggregation for interNet Access: Discussion of bandwidth aggregation solutions based on IETF technologies." <banana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/banana/>
List-Post: <mailto:banana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 12:17:18 -0000

Hi Margret et al,

Sorry for the late reply here.

I like the problem statement, thank you for defining it.

One thing I noticed which isn’t talked about is the value of the pipe. Often in bonding there is a concept of using the cheapest pipe first and placing priorities on lines based on that. This is all the more the case for fixed and mobile bonding where mobile is at a premium, but perhaps less so if providers are offering a combined solution to their customers.

In any case, should this also be part of the problem statement?

Thanks,
-- SHAREDBAND EMAIL DISCLAIMER --
Email Disclaimer: http://sharedband.com/email-disclaimer<http://sharedband.com/email-disclaimer/>

Shared Band Ltd T/A Sharedband
Registered in England No 04861356, VAT No GB822654826
Registered Office: 40 Princes St, Ipswich, Suffolk, IP1 1RJ UK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email